Hello. I haven't gotten any feedback on this issue. To me seems rather important as JDBC Master/Slave is a common configuration and if it doesn't work with the NMS provider we at least will be out of luck with using 5.3 when it is released. This is of course if it is a problem with 5.3.
Could anyone at least reply if they have JDBC Master/Slave working with version 5.3 of ActiveMQ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25575327.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
