Martin, Were your messages flagged as persistent? I ask as it may rule out persistent storage as being involved.
Jira issue opened in case someone can add something useful to it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3540 James On 13 October 2011 07:18, Martin C. <mart...@gmx.at> wrote: > I reported a similar issue back in January > ( > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Possible-Bug-quot-Deleting-inactive-destination-quot-with-pending-messages-td3229098.html > ). > Unfortunately I never got an answer. It seems to me there might be a > bug. I never raised a Jira issue, though. We just stopped using the > gcInactiveDestinations feature, but of course this is not a real > solution. > > I don't think that it is related to STOMP, because we have only been > using OpenWire, via the Java and C++ libraries. > > Best regards, > Martin > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:55 PM, James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > In 5.5.0 with gcInactiveDestinations=true, we've been sending messages > via > > STOMP with a receipt (proven in the stomp.log). > > > > Just occassionally, the message appears to go missing, as does the queue > > itself. The message is set to persist and has an expiry of several days. > > > > Is this an issue that's known about or are we chasing something of our > own > > making? > > > > James > > >
