Hi, I am not sure anymore about the settings I used. The steps to reproduce the issue as described in my previous mail were performed using the web-interface, so I suppose I used the default settings there (can't check right now, no ActiveMQ installation here, need to wait till Monday until I get back to work).
Best regards, Martin On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:51 AM, James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin, > > Were your messages flagged as persistent? I ask as it may rule out > persistent storage as being involved. > > Jira issue opened in case someone can add something useful to it: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3540 > > James > > On 13 October 2011 07:18, Martin C. <mart...@gmx.at> wrote: > >> I reported a similar issue back in January >> ( >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Possible-Bug-quot-Deleting-inactive-destination-quot-with-pending-messages-td3229098.html >> ). >> Unfortunately I never got an answer. It seems to me there might be a >> bug. I never raised a Jira issue, though. We just stopped using the >> gcInactiveDestinations feature, but of course this is not a real >> solution. >> >> I don't think that it is related to STOMP, because we have only been >> using OpenWire, via the Java and C++ libraries. >> >> Best regards, >> Martin >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:55 PM, James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > In 5.5.0 with gcInactiveDestinations=true, we've been sending messages >> via >> > STOMP with a receipt (proven in the stomp.log). >> > >> > Just occassionally, the message appears to go missing, as does the queue >> > itself. The message is set to persist and has an expiry of several days. >> > >> > Is this an issue that's known about or are we chasing something of our >> own >> > making? >> > >> > James >> > >> >
