The ZeroMQ provider isn't quite ready to be declared stable. There are still more things I want to do with it. It basically works, but due to the inherent asynchronous nature of ZeroMQ, it is difficult to create a deterministic workflow of knowing exactly when a sender and receiver are fully initialized. Any help is appreciated.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015, 3:17 AM Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/29/2015 01:50 PM, rjrizzuto wrote: > > I thought I saw that there is a new ZeroMQ provider in 1.7.0. Does the > same > > issue of not having an owner apply to it as well? > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695916.html > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > The creator of that provider has not started a formal release for it, I > can't speak to its completeness are readiness for a release as I have > not worked on it. > > -- > Tim Bish > Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc. > tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com > twitter: @tabish121 > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >
