What exactly are you proposing? Full support would be a tremendous amount of work. I started a thread on this already a while back here: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-JMS-2-0-support-in-5-x-going-forward-td4757779.html
My issue here is the lack of clarity. I have no clue what you are proposing but it needs to be defined so we don't mislead users by claiming there is JMS 2.0 support when there isn't. I listed out possible paths forward in that other thread. On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 12:04 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > It’s something that we already discussed and I moved forward on the PR. > > I propose to move forward on JMS 2.0 support. > > If the community agree, and tests are fine, I don’t see any issue to > support it in 5.17.0 as best effort. > > Anyway, I will propose the PR, and see when to include it. > > Regards > JB > > > Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:36, Christopher Shannon < > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > Since when is JMS 2.0 supposed to be supported by 5.17.0? > > > > None of the features are implemented on the server side for the new API > > calls. This was brought up in a dev discussion that there won't be JMS > 2.0 > > support on the server side in this release. > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:29 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > > wrote: > > > >> He’s not PMC but committer, so he can help anyway ;) > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:23, COURTAULT Francois < > >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> a écrit : > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I don't think Romain is still the PMC for TomEE. > >>> > >>> Best Regards. > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > >>> Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17:19 > >>> To: users@activemq.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: Which activeMQ (not Artemis) version will be JMS 2.0 or > 3.0 > >> ? > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I’m sure I can ask help from Romain about TomEE releases ;) > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:09, COURTAULT Francois < > >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> a écrit : > >>>> > >>>> Hello Jean-Baptiste, > >>>> > >>>> We are using ActiveMQ in TomEE context. > >>>> So I am just curious about when this version could be included in > TomEE > >> releases. I will push for that. > >>>> > >>>> Best Regards. > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> > >>>> Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17:05 > >>>> To: users@activemq.apache.org <mailto:users@activemq.apache.org> > >>>> Subject: Re: Which activeMQ (not Artemis) version will be JMS 2.0 or > >> 3.0 ? > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> The purpose of the RC is to cut an early release (kind of "cut > >> SNAPSHOT") to allow users to test it before the first "official" > release. > >>>> > >>>> What I can propose to you is: > >>>> > >>>> 1. I need couple of weeks to open the PRs and merge it (I’m on JDK11 > >> now, identifying/fixing/disabling some tests) 2. When done, I will > inform > >> you on the mailing list allowing you to test using the SNAPSHOTs > >> (5.17.0-SNAPSHOT) 3. If I don’t see any blocker on SNAPSHOT, then I will > >> move forward on 5.17.0 release > >>>> > >>>> Does it sound good to you ? > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> JB > >>>> > >>>>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:59, Simon Billingsley > >> <simon.billings...@matrixx.com.INVALID> a écrit : > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for the details information. > >>>>> I am interested in the Log4J 2 upgrade. > >>>>> How long does the release take after the RC process normally? > >>>>> > >>>>> Best regards, > >>>>> Simon. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 18 May 2021, at 15:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net > >> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto: > j...@nanthrax.net > >>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net><mailto: > j...@nanthrax.net > >> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi François, > >>>>> > >>>>> ActiveMQ 5.17.0 will support JMS 2.0. > >>>>> > >>>>> Basically, what I’m planning for ActiveMQ 5.17.0: > >>>>> - JDK11 build > >>>>> - Spring 5 > >>>>> - Log4j2 > >>>>> - JMS 2.0 > >>>>> > >>>>> About date target, I’m working on JDK11 build now and the other PRs > >> will follow. I would like to submit a first 5.17 RC end of June. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> JB > >>>>> > >>>>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:48, COURTAULT Francois < > >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: > >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> <mailto: > >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: > >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>><mailto: > >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: > >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> <mailto: > >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: > >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>>>> a écrit : > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>> The question to be answered is in the Subject. > >>>>> > >>>>> Best Regards. > >>> > >> > >> > >
