Hi Ray,

Thats nice. Any pointers please? 

Suresh

On Jun 12, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Ray Martin <[email protected]> wrote:

> NetBeans has some excellent examples of how to do offline WSDLs.
> 
> 
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> + 1. May be a good idea to create a JIRA as a EPIC and great it down into 
>> sub-tasks. We might have volunteers for some of the sub-tasks so you are not 
>> burdened. 
>> 
>> Suresh
>> 
>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:31 AM, Sanjaya Medonsa <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Offline mode would be the ideal solution. As Danushka mentioned validation 
>>> happens in two steps, one during the workflow composition and other during 
>>> the execution. I haven't go into details yet, if everyone agrees in high 
>>> level with the proposed approach, I could start working on it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> +1 for offline mode.
>>> 
>>> Along the same line we would need support for loading WSDL's from the file 
>>> system or from the registry, which would help composing workflows in 
>>> offline mode.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Danushka
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Sanjaya,
>>> 
>>> Thats great to see you volunteering to tackle this issues, will appreciate 
>>> your patches. There is a value on validations but I understand the 
>>> inconvenience. Can I suggest to add a "offline" mode instead. 
>>> 
>>> You will see how to pass command line options in XBaya.java and we could 
>>> have a shell script to open xbaya by passing -offline argument. This could 
>>> either turn off validations or preferably load the schemas from a location 
>>> relative and bundled within xbaya. 
>>> 
>>> Thoughts? 
>>> 
>>> Suresh
>>> 
>>> On Jun 10, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Sanjaya Medonsa <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Suresh,
>>>>        I feel it very convenient, if it possible to get rid of these 
>>>> schema validations through Internet. I had the same issue, specially when 
>>>> my mobile broadband performing badly. While doing testing, sometimes I 
>>>> have commented these validations from the code to ensure that internet is 
>>>> not an bottleneck. If the community agrees that this is something useful, 
>>>> I can work on bundling schema to avoid the need of Internet.
>>>> 
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Sanjaya
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Saminda Wijeratne <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Alexey,
>>>> 
>>>> At the moment updating the user context (XBaya) automatically once new 
>>>> descriptors are added is not there due to a technical limitation (backend 
>>>> storage does not support it) which we hope to overcome in future. For now 
>>>> you can refresh manually by right click context menues "Refresh" or 
>>>> "Reload from Registry".
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Saminda
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Alexey,
>>>> 
>>>> Very good to hear your positive feedback. We are glad to see Airavata 
>>>> might be a useful tool to support your research. Please see below for 
>>>> responses:
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 10, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Алексей Тайнов <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> >
>>>> > Hello Airavata developers and users!
>>>> > My name is Alexey.
>>>> >
>>>> > I have seen your product, when searched tool for coupling and managing
>>>> > our multi-physics simulations.
>>>> 
>>>> What models/codes are you planning to integrate for multi-physics 
>>>> simulations?
>>>> 
>>>> > I explored some products from business area (Microsoft WWF, Activity),
>>>> > engineering area (openEngSB) and decided Airavata is very interesting
>>>> > product with necessary functionality for our task. Thank for your work
>>>> > and respect it :)
>>>> 
>>>> We welcome you to join the community and contribute and it need not be 
>>>> writing code. This might be useful to read - 
>>>> http://airavata.apache.org/community/get-involved.html
>>>> 
>>>> > Now I have offering and question:
>>>> > 1. Feature (TODO). After registering new application in registry, would
>>>> > be better to reload information in the user context from server.
>>>> 
>>>> This issues should have been fixed, but I have noticed too recently. Can 
>>>> you please create a JIRA issue and provide details so we can reproduce and 
>>>> fix it - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/airavata
>>>> 
>>>> > 2. Question. When I deploy the Airavata server and xbaya on local
>>>> > computer or on the network without internet and try to use my created
>>>> > application (BBB) from xbaya components tree I get error:
>>>> > "The component is in wrong format"
>>>> > with stack message:
>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > "Caused by:
>>>> > org.apache.airavata.workflow.model.component.ComponentException: could
>>>> > not find definition for type
>>>> > {http://airavata.apache.org/schemas/gfac/2012/12}StringParameterType in
>>>> > {http://airavata.apache.org/schemas/gfac/2012/12}BBB
>>>> > "
>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >
>>>> > And my question: how I can deploy airavata on local computer or local
>>>> > net without internet?
>>>> 
>>>> Unfortunately not. There is very limited capabilities you can use Airavata 
>>>> for without accessing network. But your use case is making me think 
>>>> otherwise. May be you want to execute all the applications locally and 
>>>> Airavata can still help you and you should not be needed internet. We can 
>>>> work around this issues by bundling these schema with XBaya. If using 
>>>> Airavata offline is compelling use case and a show stopper for you, 
>>>> complain again and lets see if it motivates any one to fix it or 
>>>> contribute a patch.
>>>> 
>>>> >
>>>> > P.S. Microsoft Windows 32, Airavata 0.7,
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Suresh
>>>> 
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you for attention!
>>>> > Best Regards
>>>> >
>>>> > Taynov  Alexey
>>>> > [email protected]
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to