Hi Sanjaya,

Yes please, that will help track and also assign for releases. Also during 
releases we auto-generate change notes from JIRA issues and this will help 
there as well.

Suresh

On Jun 14, 2013, at 8:06 AM, Sanjaya Medonsa <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Suresh,
> Do you want me to create the JIRA ticket with the details of the issue ?
> 
> Best regards,
> Sanjaya
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote:
> + 1. May be a good idea to create a JIRA as a EPIC and great it down into 
> sub-tasks. We might have volunteers for some of the sub-tasks so you are not 
> burdened. 
> 
> Suresh
> 
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:31 AM, Sanjaya Medonsa <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Offline mode would be the ideal solution. As Danushka mentioned validation 
>> happens in two steps, one during the workflow composition and other during 
>> the execution. I haven't go into details yet, if everyone agrees in high 
>> level with the proposed approach, I could start working on it.
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> +1 for offline mode.
>> 
>> Along the same line we would need support for loading WSDL's from the file 
>> system or from the registry, which would help composing workflows in offline 
>> mode.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Sanjaya,
>> 
>> Thats great to see you volunteering to tackle this issues, will appreciate 
>> your patches. There is a value on validations but I understand the 
>> inconvenience. Can I suggest to add a "offline" mode instead. 
>> 
>> You will see how to pass command line options in XBaya.java and we could 
>> have a shell script to open xbaya by passing -offline argument. This could 
>> either turn off validations or preferably load the schemas from a location 
>> relative and bundled within xbaya. 
>> 
>> Thoughts? 
>> 
>> Suresh
>> 
>> On Jun 10, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Sanjaya Medonsa <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Suresh,
>>>        I feel it very convenient, if it possible to get rid of these schema 
>>> validations through Internet. I had the same issue, specially when my 
>>> mobile broadband performing badly. While doing testing, sometimes I have 
>>> commented these validations from the code to ensure that internet is not an 
>>> bottleneck. If the community agrees that this is something useful, I can 
>>> work on bundling schema to avoid the need of Internet.
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Sanjaya
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Saminda Wijeratne <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Alexey,
>>> 
>>> At the moment updating the user context (XBaya) automatically once new 
>>> descriptors are added is not there due to a technical limitation (backend 
>>> storage does not support it) which we hope to overcome in future. For now 
>>> you can refresh manually by right click context menues "Refresh" or "Reload 
>>> from Registry".
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Saminda
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Alexey,
>>> 
>>> Very good to hear your positive feedback. We are glad to see Airavata might 
>>> be a useful tool to support your research. Please see below for responses:
>>> 
>>> On Jun 10, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Алексей Тайнов <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> >
>>> > Hello Airavata developers and users!
>>> > My name is Alexey.
>>> >
>>> > I have seen your product, when searched tool for coupling and managing
>>> > our multi-physics simulations.
>>> 
>>> What models/codes are you planning to integrate for multi-physics 
>>> simulations?
>>> 
>>> > I explored some products from business area (Microsoft WWF, Activity),
>>> > engineering area (openEngSB) and decided Airavata is very interesting
>>> > product with necessary functionality for our task. Thank for your work
>>> > and respect it :)
>>> 
>>> We welcome you to join the community and contribute and it need not be 
>>> writing code. This might be useful to read - 
>>> http://airavata.apache.org/community/get-involved.html
>>> 
>>> > Now I have offering and question:
>>> > 1. Feature (TODO). After registering new application in registry, would
>>> > be better to reload information in the user context from server.
>>> 
>>> This issues should have been fixed, but I have noticed too recently. Can 
>>> you please create a JIRA issue and provide details so we can reproduce and 
>>> fix it - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/airavata
>>> 
>>> > 2. Question. When I deploy the Airavata server and xbaya on local
>>> > computer or on the network without internet and try to use my created
>>> > application (BBB) from xbaya components tree I get error:
>>> > "The component is in wrong format"
>>> > with stack message:
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > "Caused by:
>>> > org.apache.airavata.workflow.model.component.ComponentException: could
>>> > not find definition for type
>>> > {http://airavata.apache.org/schemas/gfac/2012/12}StringParameterType in
>>> > {http://airavata.apache.org/schemas/gfac/2012/12}BBB
>>> > "
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > And my question: how I can deploy airavata on local computer or local
>>> > net without internet?
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately not. There is very limited capabilities you can use Airavata 
>>> for without accessing network. But your use case is making me think 
>>> otherwise. May be you want to execute all the applications locally and 
>>> Airavata can still help you and you should not be needed internet. We can 
>>> work around this issues by bundling these schema with XBaya. If using 
>>> Airavata offline is compelling use case and a show stopper for you, 
>>> complain again and lets see if it motivates any one to fix it or contribute 
>>> a patch.
>>> 
>>> >
>>> > P.S. Microsoft Windows 32, Airavata 0.7,
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Suresh
>>> 
>>> >
>>> > Thank you for attention!
>>> > Best Regards
>>> >
>>> > Taynov  Alexey
>>> > [email protected]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to