On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:37:13PM +0100, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: > Maybe, maybe not.
Well, I did it and it wasn't too bad. > One obvious "counterhack" would be to autogenerate some configfile where > it is stored. > However, *I* got lost in the quite well designed event system. Is it not > possibly to somehow sneak in a traditional sequential (non-event driven) > query to the database right after opening a connection to it? Right after authenticating, you mean. That's what I meant to do in commit a0ddbe03a28868fdbe3f4f447af60c94e383896a, and obviously it wasn't good enough. So either I'm too stupid or it just can't be done. Either way I changed it. I like code I can comprehend, fallible as I am. Arnt
