Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: >On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:37:13PM +0100, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: >> However, *I* got lost in the quite well designed event system. Is it not >> possibly to somehow sneak in a traditional sequential (non-event driven) >> query to the database right after opening a connection to it?
>Right after authenticating, you mean. That's what I meant to do in >commit a0ddbe03a28868fdbe3f4f447af60c94e383896a, and obviously it >wasn't good enough. Well, the way you do/did it is by adding the query to the regular event-driven queue, at which point it becomes susceptible to things a not being the first query in that queue or queue reordering/splitting across connections. -- Stephen.
