Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: >IIRC the problem with doing small batches was that when Abhijit and I >tried, we ended up doing a giant seqscan anyway to identify >candidates. I'll be very happy if Stephen has found a way that avoids >that (or if pg has grown more capable).
Erm, not that I want to push anyone, but since I'm running this New & Improved vacuum since last Sunday, I'd appreciate a heads up on if what I did was at least reasonably ok, or if I'm messing things up. I have not noticed any adverse effects, so far, but that does not necessarily mean that everything is alright. -- Stephen.
