Yes, please, that would be great.  Ill throw it into Google Translate and
look at the graphs.

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, 6:42 PM Chen Li <[email protected]> wrote:

> About one year ago some students in China did an AsterixDB/Greenplum and
> wrote a report in Chinese.  If needed, I can contact them to get the report
> again, since the old one was not kept.
>
> Chen
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:44 PM Michael Carey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You should be fine:  "The Greenplum project is released under the Apache
>> 2 license." (quoting from their github repo)  :-)
>>
>> This sounds like an interesting undertaking - keep us posted and feel
>> free to come here for support/Q's/tuning thoughts/etc.  You should be
>> able to grab a copy of BigFUN and its data generator if using it is of
>> interest; exactly where to find those will be listed in the BigFUN paper
>> references.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On 8/7/19 2:35 PM, Karl Pietrzak wrote:
>> > Thanks, Michael!  I'm looking to compare AsterixDB against Greenplum
>> > and post the results.  Anyone know if Greenplum has the "DeWitt clause"?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:20 PM Michael Carey <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     (Meant to reply to the list!)
>> >
>> >
>> >     -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> >     Subject:  Re: what parallel DBMS is AsterixDB compared against?
>> >     Date:     Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:18:04 -0700
>> >     From:     Michael Carey <[email protected]>
>> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >     To:       Karl Pietrzak <[email protected]> <mailto:
>> [email protected]>
>> >
>> >
>> >     It's known in the literature as "System X" - other work, e.g., the
>> >     early MIT/Brown work in 2008-2009, used that same system in their
>> >     work on commercial databases vs. Hadoop and referred to it as
>> >     "System X" (so we did the same, name-wise).  Most for-pay database
>> >     vendors' license agreements have a clause known informally as the
>> >     "DeWitt clause" that prohibit publishing any performance results
>> >     from their systems, so the tradition in the DBMS academic
>> >     benchmarking world is to not name the systems.  This one was a
>> >     commercial shared-nothing parallel DBMS that is known to be a
>> >     solid performer (it wasn't just a strawman) and in the end the
>> >     graduate student who ran the numbers visited them on-site to get
>> >     some help in properly setting up the system.
>> >
>> >     If you go to http://asterix.ics.uci.edu//publications.html you can
>> >     find a copy of the BigFUN benchmark paper (which this was a
>> >     preliminary version of) as well as some other papers that might be
>> >     of interest.
>> >
>> >     Cheers,
>> >
>> >     Mike
>> >
>> >     On 8/7/19 10:52 AM, Karl Pietrzak wrote:
>> >>     Hi everyone!
>> >>
>> >>     Looking at the home page
>> >>     (https://asterixdb.apache.org/index.html), I'm wondering what
>> >>     parallel DBMS is AsterixDB being compared against?
>> >>
>> >>     Is there more information on this benchmark, too?
>> >>
>> >>     Thanks!
>> >>
>> >>     --
>> >>     Karl
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Karl
>>
>

Reply via email to