Can you please not include me in this email thread? Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: Karl Pietrzak <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 7:03:59 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: what parallel DBMS is AsterixDB compared against?
Yes, please, that would be great. Ill throw it into Google Translate and look at the graphs. On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, 6:42 PM Chen Li <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: About one year ago some students in China did an AsterixDB/Greenplum and wrote a report in Chinese. If needed, I can contact them to get the report again, since the old one was not kept. Chen On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:44 PM Michael Carey <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: You should be fine: "The Greenplum project is released under the Apache 2 license." (quoting from their github repo) :-) This sounds like an interesting undertaking - keep us posted and feel free to come here for support/Q's/tuning thoughts/etc. You should be able to grab a copy of BigFUN and its data generator if using it is of interest; exactly where to find those will be listed in the BigFUN paper references. Cheers, Mike On 8/7/19 2:35 PM, Karl Pietrzak wrote: > Thanks, Michael! I'm looking to compare AsterixDB against Greenplum > and post the results. Anyone know if Greenplum has the "DeWitt clause"? > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:20 PM Michael Carey > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > (Meant to reply to the list!) > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: what parallel DBMS is AsterixDB compared against? > Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:18:04 -0700 > From: Michael Carey <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > <mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > To: Karl Pietrzak <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > <mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > > It's known in the literature as "System X" - other work, e.g., the > early MIT/Brown work in 2008-2009, used that same system in their > work on commercial databases vs. Hadoop and referred to it as > "System X" (so we did the same, name-wise). Most for-pay database > vendors' license agreements have a clause known informally as the > "DeWitt clause" that prohibit publishing any performance results > from their systems, so the tradition in the DBMS academic > benchmarking world is to not name the systems. This one was a > commercial shared-nothing parallel DBMS that is known to be a > solid performer (it wasn't just a strawman) and in the end the > graduate student who ran the numbers visited them on-site to get > some help in properly setting up the system. > > If you go to http://asterix.ics.uci.edu//publications.html you can > find a copy of the BigFUN benchmark paper (which this was a > preliminary version of) as well as some other papers that might be > of interest. > > Cheers, > > Mike > > On 8/7/19 10:52 AM, Karl Pietrzak wrote: >> Hi everyone! >> >> Looking at the home page >> (https://asterixdb.apache.org/index.html), I'm wondering what >> parallel DBMS is AsterixDB being compared against? >> >> Is there more information on this benchmark, too? >> >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> Karl > > > > -- > Karl
