Alex Karasulu wrote:
There is no overlap between api and impl jar. Its just the framework alone and that makes sense since it's the whole thing right?
Yep - framework is the combination of impl and api. IMP we should not provide it in a dist.
Steve.
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Avalon framework users
Subject: Re: Question Regarding Separation of Framework Jars
Alex Karasulu wrote:
I noticed that the framework jar has been separated into 3 jars:
framework-<version>.jar
framework-api-<version>.jar
framework-impl-<version>.jar
I'm guessing that you have built this using the avalon/framework build.
1). What is the purpose for this?
In the avalon-sandbox/framework I've put in place a build system which does not generate a single framework jar file. The only reason I for this seems to me for backward compatibility with gump. To achieve that we just need a gump scipt that is dependent on framework-api and framework-impl , and does nothing more that generates a jar containing the combination of both.
2). Why is there an overlap in the classes stored in the first and second jars?
There should be no overlap between api and impl. Can you provide more details.
Stephen.
Thanks, Alex
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osm.net
Sent via James running under Merlin as an NT service. http://avalon.apache.org/sandbox/merlin
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
