On Thursday 26 February 2004 04:54, Scott Brickner wrote: > Not to put too fine a point on it, that's a bunch of horse hockey.
<snip content="horse hockey rebound" > Please read my "except for some use-cases". And I will not continue this argument, as it doesn't belong here, and can quickly turn ugly... Don't you agree? </snip> > To the point of the thread, though, @avalon.dependency out to be > inherited. Perhaps with a way to explicitly suppress the inheritance > when you don't want it. The dependencies of a base class, when you're > using inheritance correctly, *should* be inherited. As should the > @avalon.service tags. They're part of the class' contract, which is > inherited. This DO belong. _I_ still disagree with what you are suggesting, but feel free to implement it, and share your findings. Cheers Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
