Dear Junjun,

Thanks very much for your prompt feedback.
I agree that it's not worth spending time fixing the issue if the 0.8 release is coming up soon.
I tried the link.
There is this issue in the Filters dialog box: when I want to click on any "upload file" button, the window jumps back to the top.
Otherwise, the interface looks really great.
Best wishes

Henri-Jean

Le 05/08/2011 22:45, Junjun Zhang a écrit :
Dear Henri-Jean,

After executing the same query directly using SQL SELECT statement against the database and testing the same query on a BioMart 0.8 server. It is confirmed that they both do not have any problem of missing or duplicating results. So problem is caused by BioMart 0.7 query batching.

Please try this if you'd like to test your gene IDs:
http://central.biomart.org/martwizard/#!/Genome?mart=Ensembl+Genes+63+(WTSI%2C+UK)&step=1&datasets=mmusculus_gene_ensembl <http://central.biomart.org/martwizard/#%21/Genome?mart=Ensembl+Genes+63+%28WTSI%2C+UK%29&step=1&datasets=mmusculus_gene_ensembl>

Cheers,
Junjun


From: jzhang <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 01:33:34 -0400
To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, Elena Rivkin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [BioMart Users] Mouse EnsemblTranscriptID retrieval

    Dear Henri-Jean,

    Thanks for sending the lists of IDs to us for testing. Based on
    Elena's test here, we can confirm the problem exists, however, we
    have not had a chance to look into it closely enough to figure out
    what exactly causes the problem. It very likely has something to
    do with BioMart 0.7's query batching (that I described a few days
    ago in another thread), which may result in missing/duplicating
    rows in the result. As I mentioned earlier, this will not happen
    in 0.8 where batching is implemented in a different way.

    We will continue the investigation and get you back when we found
    something concrete.

    Best regards,
    Junjun


    From: Henri-Jean Garchon <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Reply-To: "[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>"
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:49:43 -0400
    To: Elena Rivkin <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>, jzhang <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Cc: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>"
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Subject: Re: [BioMart Users] Mouse EnsemblTranscriptID retrieval

        Dear Elena, Dear JunJun,

        Many thanks to both of you for having taken the time to
        address my request a month ago.
        I agree that using the viewer with limit set to 10 to
        illustrate my issue was not very bright! Apologies.

        I must say that things have changed substantially since then
        and look much better today. The output file  generated after
        retrivieving "EntrezGene.ID"is a lot more consistent than a
        month ago. There are fewer duplicates (and actually no
        duplicate rows in the output table as there used to be), much
        fewer "NA" entries from Entrez (although I checked these null
        entries have an associated gene name). I guess these are
        issues with the Entrez database. Perhaps, what is most
        important: all input  Ensembl.Gene.ID are present in the
        outpout table.

        My concern now is an issue with the retrieval of
        Ensembl.Transcript.ID, the default attributes of Biomart:

        Actually I am working with a list of 22308 Ensembl gene ID
        mapped on the Affymetrix Mouse Gene 1.0 ST microarray.
        I uploaded this list on the Biomart.org website to filter my
        query.
        The database is Ensembl build 63, the dataset is NCBIM37.
        I retrieve the output  as a TSV file ("export all results to",
        not checking "unique results only").
        I  then go to R to check this output file.

        The output table has 75966 row, of which 59458 are unique. In
        other words, 42950 rows are unique and 16508 are duplicated.
        Why some rows are duplicated and others not perhaps might be
        explained.
        My main concern is that 6467 input Ensembl.Gene.IDs are not
        retrieved and are missing from the output table.  These are
        bona fide genes with regular associated gene names. If I
        upload the list of these missing guys, I now get the
        corresponding transcripts. All of them are retrieved and there
        are no duplicate rows!

        In anticipation I thank you very much for your valuable help
        and comments

        Best regards

        Henri-Jean


        Le 24/06/2011 15:24, Elena Rivkin a écrit :
        Dr. Henri-Jean Garchon,

        The reason for only seeing a subset of EntrezGeneID is b/c
        only some transcripts do not have EntrezGene ID associated
        with them. If you select Ensembl Transcript ID as an
        attribute, you will se which transcripts correspond to which
        EntrezGene ID.

        For example.
        ENSMUSG00000026073 (Illr2)  - only one of transcripts
        (ENSMUST00000027243) has EntrezGene ID

        And

        ENSMUSG00000035208 (Slfn8) - has two different EntrezGEneIDs,
        although only one transcript (ENSMUST00000038141).

        I hope it helps.

        Elena

        From: Henri-Jean GARCHON <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        Reply-To: "[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>"
        <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:00:03 -0400
        To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>"
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        Subject: [BioMart Users] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript
        for details



        -------- Message original --------
        Sujet:  Returned mail: see transcript for details
        Date :  Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:48:20 +0100
        De :    Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]>
        Pour :  <[email protected]>



        The original message was received at Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:48:20 +0100
        from mx1.ebi.ac.uk [193.62.197.214]

            ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
        [email protected]
             (reason: 550 Host unknown)
             (expanded from:<[email protected]>)

            ----- Transcript of session follows -----
        550 [email protected]... Host unknown (Name server: 
biomart.org.redirect: host not found)


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.biomart.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to