Thank you Junjun.

Elena, to answer your question, I believe the ncbi links in the below thread 
include a link to the protein where you can get the protein accession number.  
For example, for the 2 transcripts below you will find links to the following 
proteins.  You will also see that the transcripts are correctly showing up on 
the URL's as being protein coding.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/471128 (accession BAA05928)
and
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/11558488 (accession CAC17726)


Thank you,
Phillipe



________________________________
From: Junjun Zhang <[email protected]>
To: pip pipster <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: Rhoda Kinsella via RT <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [BioMart Users] Bug or User error with filtering?


Hi Phillipe,

I am forwarding your questions to the Ensembl Helpdesk. Ensembl team is the 
best to answer questions about data contents in Ensembl databases.

Cheers,
Junjun

From:  Elena Rivkin <[email protected]>
Date:  Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:46:35 -0400
To:  pip pipster <[email protected]>, Rhoda Kinsella <[email protected]>, 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject:  Re: [BioMart Users] Bug or User error with filtering?


Hi Phillipe, 
>Can you let me know, for these two transcripts, what are their Genbank protein 
>accessions. I cant find them. 
>
>
>Thank you. 
>Elena Rivkin, PhD
>Outreach and Training Coordinator, Informatics and Bio-computing
>
>Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
>MaRS Centre, South Tower
>101 College Street, Suite 800
>Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 0A3
>
>
>Tel: 647-258-4316
>Toll-free: 1-866-678-6427
>www.oicr.on.ca
>
>
>This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged 
>information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or 
>distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally 
>intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
>please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or 
>other information contained in this message may not be that of the 
>organization.
> 
>
>From:  pip pipster <[email protected]>
>Reply-To:  pip pipster <[email protected]>
>Date:  Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:32:43 -0400
>To:  Rhoda Kinsella <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Subject:  Re: [BioMart Users] Bug or User error with filtering?
>
>
>
>After doing more investigation, something definitely isn't adding up.  As it 
>turns out, filtering by Genbank protein accession is what we want and we need 
>the ability to exclude.  The 2 transcripts below are examples (they show up as 
>protein coding Genbank as well as Ensembl) but there are thousands more like 
>this.  The filter below is taking them out despite them having a Genbank 
>protein accession.  What may be causing this?
>
>
>
>ENST00000169293
>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=gene&cmd=search&term=ENST00000169293
>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/D28593?
>
>http://useast.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Transcript/Summary?g=ENSG00000127241;r=3:186964149-187009745;t=ENST00000169293
>
>ENST00000345514
>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene?term=ENST00000345514
>http://useast.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Transcript/Summary?g=ENSG00000127152;r=14:99635624-99737822;t=ENST00000345514
>
>
>
>
>Filter used:
>Manual (non-Perl)
>    Homo sapiens genes (GRCh37.p3)
>    Filters
>        with protein ID(s): Only
>    Attributes
>        Ensembl Gene ID
>        Ensembl Transcript ID
>
>
>Same problem occurs using Perl filter as well
>    $query->addFilter("with_protein_id", ["Only"]);
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: pip pipster <[email protected]>
>To: Rhoda Kinsella <[email protected]>
>Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 8:07 AM
>Subject: Re: [BioMart Users] Bug or User error with filtering?
>
>
>Rhoda,
>Thank you for the feedback, very helpful.  The Gene Type filter, 
>'protein_coding' will likely work, however it doesn't allow me to do an 
>'exclude' type filter (i.e. give me everything except for the non 
>protein-coding genes).  Do you know if you can still do an exclude using the 
>method you described?
>
>
>Thank you!
>Phillipe
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: Rhoda Kinsella <[email protected]>
>To: pip pipster <[email protected]>
>Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 5:04 AM
>Subject: Re: [BioMart Users] Bug or User error with filtering?
>
>
>Hi Phillipe
>You are filtering using the protein ID (Genbank protein accession) and as this 
>Ensembl protein ID does not have a corresponding Genbank protein accession, 
>you will not get this ENSP. Please filter using the Gene type filter and 
>select protein_coding. That way you will get the ENSP data you require.
>Regards
>Rhoda
>
>
>
>
>On 21 Aug 2011, at 22:54, pip pipster wrote:
>
>We are seeing strange things occur with the protein ID filter.  For example, 
>transcript ENST00000345514 is being filtered out by the following search 
>below.  However, you can see that it indeed has a Preotin ID shown here:  
>http://useast.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Transcript/Summary?db=core;g=ENSG00000127152;r=14:99635624-99737861;t=ENST00000345514
> .  Any idea why this is being filtered?  Could this be a bug in Biomart/Data 
>or User Error?
>>
>>Manual (non-Perl)
>>    Homo sapiens genes (GRCh37.p3)
>>    Filters
>>        with protein ID(s): Only
>>    Attributes
>>        Ensembl Gene ID
>>        Ensembl Transcript ID
>>
>>
>>Same problem occurs using Perl filter as well
>>    $query->addFilter("with_protein_id", ["Only"]);
>>
>>
>>Thank you,
>>Phillipe
>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://lists.biomart.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>Rhoda Kinsella Ph.D.
>Ensembl Bioinformatician,
>European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI),
>Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, 
>Hinxton
>Cambridge CB10 1SD,
>UK. 
>
>
>
>
> 
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.biomart.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to