I've read it, and have problems understanding what you mean by main repository then?
Nowhere in Vic's message do I see a synchronization step where commits end up in svn? Martijn On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Martijn Dashorst <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com >> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com> wrote: >> > I'm with you in using Github as the main repository: >> >> As an ASF Member I must protest against the direction that you are >> taking this project. GitHub can not be used as the main repository for >> any ASF Project. The canonical resource for Apache project's code must >> be hosted on Apache hardware. Since the only repository that is >> supported by Infrastructure is SVN, you'll have to maintain the >> primary source for your project *in* SVN. Not somewhere else, not >> bypassing ASF authorizations, not bypassing Apache policy. >> > > Since when have we not made Buildr code available through SVN? > > You're reading my comment sans context. You have to start with Vic's email > to which I'm replying. > > Assaf > > >> >> Martijn >> > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
