Please note, that I am fan of github. I'd wish Apache would have the same infrastructure as github. It would give the ASF Community a real sparkle: the social aspects of github are really nice.
Martijn On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Martijn Dashorst <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've read it, and have problems understanding what you mean by main > repository then? > > Nowhere in Vic's message do I see a synchronization step where commits > end up in svn? > > Martijn > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Martijn Dashorst <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com >>> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com> wrote: >>> > I'm with you in using Github as the main repository: >>> >>> As an ASF Member I must protest against the direction that you are >>> taking this project. GitHub can not be used as the main repository for >>> any ASF Project. The canonical resource for Apache project's code must >>> be hosted on Apache hardware. Since the only repository that is >>> supported by Infrastructure is SVN, you'll have to maintain the >>> primary source for your project *in* SVN. Not somewhere else, not >>> bypassing ASF authorizations, not bypassing Apache policy. >>> >> >> Since when have we not made Buildr code available through SVN? >> >> You're reading my comment sans context. You have to start with Vic's email >> to which I'm replying. >> >> Assaf >> >> >>> >>> Martijn >>> >> > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
