I'm pretty excited to see somebody picking up the Clojure work! Saw a presentation on Cascalog<http://nathanmarz.com/blog/introducing-cascalog-a-clojure-based-query-language-for-hado.html> last week and I must say it beats the crap out of all the other Hadoop querying frontends. Hurray for tools based on Turing-complete languages :)
alex On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Chris Dean <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. I'll give it a go. > > My ignorance of Buildr is profound, but I'll see if I can stumble > through. > > Cheers, > Chris Dean > > Daniel Spiewak <[email protected]> writes: > > Tweak the branch! Tweak the branch! :-) > > > > It is quite a bit out of date, I must admit. I think I had it updated to > > Buildr 1.3.5 and Clojure 1.0, but that was about where things stopped. > > Clearly things have moved forward since then. My advice to you would be > to > > fork that branch and then rebase it forward to the latest from git:// > > git.apache.org/buildr.git (which is an official mirror of the SVN, > > maintained by Apache). If you can get something working, we would love > to > > fold it into the Buildr mainline. I've always thought that Clojure > support > > in Buildr would be cool (naturally, since I started the branch), I just > > haven't had time to work on it recently. > > > > Daniel > > > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Chris Dean <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I'm interested in using Buildr on a Clojure project. I downloaded a > >> fork of buildr from http://github.com/djspiewak/buildr and managed to > >> get that somewhat working. > >> > >> If I wanted to continue using Buildr and Clojure what is the best path > >> to take? Should I tweak this branch? or is there something working in a > >> newer branch? > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris Dean > >> >
