I'm happy to work with whatever schedule seems best.  There's not a big
rush as I'm using the branch for my day to day work now.

Cheers,
Chris Dean

Antoine Toulme <[email protected]> writes:
> I'm away until Thursday, and will probably be more available next week.
>
> I would love to squeeze a release this month so adding clojure support is
> not at the top of my list at this point, but I can try to work on it if we
> are ahead of the curve.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antoine
>
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 20:47, Alex Boisvert <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Chris.  I'm traveling this week and on semi-vacation so I'll
>> take a look when I return.
>> (Other committers are welcome to review and commit.)
>>
>> alex
>>
>> On Friday, August 6, 2010, Chris Dean <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I added a patch to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-259
>> >
>> > There is also a git repo at http://github.com/ctdean/buildr
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Chris Dean
>> >
>> > Alex Boisvert <[email protected]> writes:
>> >> The best way to send a patch is through Jira (and clicking the ASF
>> license
>> >> grant checkbox).
>> >>
>> >> *BUT* if you think the code needs some iterating over (by you or other
>> >> non-committers) before it's finalized, it's probably better to put it on
>> >> github as a fork of http://github.com/apache/buildr.
>> >>
>> >> Another option would be to keep it separate from buildr and package it
>> as a
>> >> plugin (gem).   This way, it could evolve independently of buildr on its
>> own
>> >> release cycle.  If you're interested in trying this out but getting it
>> to
>> >> work as a plugin seems like a challenge to you, let's start with a
>> complete
>> >> fork and I can help to make it a plugin as a second step.
>> >>
>> >> alex
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Chris Dean <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I have something working on my desktop.  I'm sure that there are many
>> >>> things wrong, but it's ready for someone else to take a look at it.
>> >>> What's the best way to send a patch?
>> >>>
>> >>> Currently we have working:
>> >>>
>> >>> - Compiling clojure
>> >>> - Running clojure tests
>> >>> - A clojure shell/repl
>> >>> - A running swank server (Swank is part of an Emacs dev environment)
>> >>> - Some docs
>> >>>
>> >>> for some definition of "working".
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Chris Dean
>> >>>
>> >>> Chris Dean <[email protected]> writes:
>> >>> > Thanks.  I'll give it a go.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > My ignorance of Buildr is profound, but I'll see if I can stumble
>> >>> > through.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Cheers,
>> >>> > Chris Dean
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Daniel Spiewak <[email protected]> writes:
>> >>> >> Tweak the branch!  Tweak the branch!  :-)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> It is quite a bit out of date, I must admit.  I think I had it
>> updated
>> >>> to
>> >>> >> Buildr 1.3.5 and Clojure 1.0, but that was about where things
>> stopped.
>> >>> >> Clearly things have moved forward since then.  My advice to you
>> would be
>> >>> to
>> >>> >> fork that branch and then rebase it forward to the latest from
>> git://
>> >>> >> git.apache.org/buildr.git (which is an official mirror of the SVN,
>> >>> >> maintained by Apache).  If you can get something working, we would
>> love
>> >>> to
>> >>> >> fold it into the Buildr mainline.  I've always thought that Clojure
>> >>> support
>> >>> >> in Buildr would be cool (naturally, since I started the branch), I
>> just
>> >>> >> haven't had time to work on it recently.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Daniel
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Chris Dean <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> I'm interested in using Buildr on a Clojure project.  I downloaded
>> a
>> >>> >>> fork of buildr from http://github.com/djspiewak/buildr and managed
>> to
>> >>> >>> get that somewhat working.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> If I wanted to continue using Buildr and Clojure what is the best
>> path
>> >>> >>> to take?  Should I tweak this branch? or is there something working
>> in
>> >>> a
>> >>> >>> newer branch?
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> >>> Chris Dean
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>

Reply via email to