Yeah, just tried it, getting same result. Not just scala; rjb 1.2.8 can't load classes. Don't know why yet.
alex On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Antoine Toulme <[email protected]>wrote: > 1.2.8 failed for me with Scala throwing CNF exceptions. > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:36, Alex Boisvert <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I think it would be wise (and compassionate) to only depend on rjb >> versions having pre-compiled binaries for Windows. >> >> It is too late to upgrade to rjb 1.2.8 for Buidlr 1.4.2? I know you >> tried 1.2.8 ... did it work for you? >> >> alex >> >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Antoine Toulme >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> We use rjb 1.2.5. You will need to compile rjb always because it contains >>> native extensions. >>> >>> If you want a better experience, either ditch Windows or use JRuby. We >>> also >>> make a all-in-one package available on the rubyforge site. >>> >>> We will update our installation instructions in the coming months by >>> adapting them to rvm environments. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Antoine >>> >>> 2010/9/20 Khristian Alexander Schönrock <[email protected]> >>> >>> > I ran into the same problem some time ago. I solved it by downloading >>> a >>> > rjb gem which included the native extension (1.2.5, I think) and edited >>> the >>> > version number to the one buildr wanted (1.2.6). Installed the hacked >>> rjb >>> > gem, then buildr, without problems. >>> > >>> > Em 20/09/2010 12:09, Samuel Ecko escreveu: >>> > >>> > Just wanted to report my installation issues with Buildr on my Windows >>> >> 7 64bit machine and how I worked around them. >>> >> >>> >> I am new to Buildr and Ruby, so I'm not sure if the problems are >>> >> specific to my computer and/or OS or not. I tried to follow the >>> >> install instructions from the Buildr website >>> >> (http://buildr.apache.org/installing.html#windows) and downloaded >>> >> RubyInstaller for Windows 1.8.7 (and rolled back to 1.8.6 when I ran >>> >> into troubles). >>> >> >>> >> To me it seems that Buildr 1.4.1 requires version 1.2.5 of rjb >>> >> (Ruby-Java-Bridge), but the standard gems repository does not have a >>> >> pre-compiled package for 1.2.5, only for the latest version 1.2.8. See >>> >> http://rubygems.org/gems/rjb/versions. This is why installing Buildr >>> >> with the platform --platform=mswin32 switch will trigger a compile of >>> >> rjb which subsequently fails without a C compiler being present on the >>> >> system. >>> >> >>> >> The RubyInstaller for Windows cannot compile Ruby gems by default, and >>> >> fails with a rather obscure message pointing in the wrong direction, >>> >> more precisely the check for jni.h in the JAVA_HOME / include >>> >> directory fails and a Ruby noob like me would assume a problem with >>> >> the Java install or some permission problem. Google did not really >>> >> help (quickly). >>> >> >>> >> What did the trick for me was to install the 'DevKit' from the >>> >> RubyInstaller for W. website. Version 4.5.0 failed with a different >>> >> error message ('long long long is too long'), but with 3.4.5 I was >>> >> finally able to compile rjb 1.2.5 and install Buildr 1.4.1. >>> >> >>> >> Other steps I took that might or might not have affected the outcome >>> >> of the install >>> >> - use 32bit JDK instead of 64bit >>> >> - set JAVA_HOME to 8.3 character file name, e.g. >>> >> c:\progra~2\java\jdk1.6.0_21 >>> >> - install Ruby into a directory path that does not contain spaces >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Hope my email will help other Buildr/Ruby noobs and/or maybe help >>> >> solve the dependency problem (if there actually is one ;)) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Samuel Ecko >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >
