I reported this on RJB forum: http://rubyforge.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=48689&forum_id=8190
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Alex Boisvert <[email protected]>wrote: > Yeah, just tried it, getting same result. Not just scala; rjb 1.2.8 > can't load classes. Don't know why yet. > > alex > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Antoine Toulme > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> 1.2.8 failed for me with Scala throwing CNF exceptions. >> >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:36, Alex Boisvert <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I think it would be wise (and compassionate) to only depend on rjb >>> versions having pre-compiled binaries for Windows. >>> >>> It is too late to upgrade to rjb 1.2.8 for Buidlr 1.4.2? I know you >>> tried 1.2.8 ... did it work for you? >>> >>> alex >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Antoine Toulme <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> We use rjb 1.2.5. You will need to compile rjb always because it >>>> contains >>>> native extensions. >>>> >>>> If you want a better experience, either ditch Windows or use JRuby. We >>>> also >>>> make a all-in-one package available on the rubyforge site. >>>> >>>> We will update our installation instructions in the coming months by >>>> adapting them to rvm environments. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Antoine >>>> >>>> 2010/9/20 Khristian Alexander Schönrock <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> > I ran into the same problem some time ago. I solved it by downloading >>>> a >>>> > rjb gem which included the native extension (1.2.5, I think) and >>>> edited the >>>> > version number to the one buildr wanted (1.2.6). Installed the hacked >>>> rjb >>>> > gem, then buildr, without problems. >>>> > >>>> > Em 20/09/2010 12:09, Samuel Ecko escreveu: >>>> > >>>> > Just wanted to report my installation issues with Buildr on my >>>> Windows >>>> >> 7 64bit machine and how I worked around them. >>>> >> >>>> >> I am new to Buildr and Ruby, so I'm not sure if the problems are >>>> >> specific to my computer and/or OS or not. I tried to follow the >>>> >> install instructions from the Buildr website >>>> >> (http://buildr.apache.org/installing.html#windows) and downloaded >>>> >> RubyInstaller for Windows 1.8.7 (and rolled back to 1.8.6 when I ran >>>> >> into troubles). >>>> >> >>>> >> To me it seems that Buildr 1.4.1 requires version 1.2.5 of rjb >>>> >> (Ruby-Java-Bridge), but the standard gems repository does not have a >>>> >> pre-compiled package for 1.2.5, only for the latest version 1.2.8. >>>> See >>>> >> http://rubygems.org/gems/rjb/versions. This is why installing Buildr >>>> >> with the platform --platform=mswin32 switch will trigger a compile of >>>> >> rjb which subsequently fails without a C compiler being present on >>>> the >>>> >> system. >>>> >> >>>> >> The RubyInstaller for Windows cannot compile Ruby gems by default, >>>> and >>>> >> fails with a rather obscure message pointing in the wrong direction, >>>> >> more precisely the check for jni.h in the JAVA_HOME / include >>>> >> directory fails and a Ruby noob like me would assume a problem with >>>> >> the Java install or some permission problem. Google did not really >>>> >> help (quickly). >>>> >> >>>> >> What did the trick for me was to install the 'DevKit' from the >>>> >> RubyInstaller for W. website. Version 4.5.0 failed with a different >>>> >> error message ('long long long is too long'), but with 3.4.5 I was >>>> >> finally able to compile rjb 1.2.5 and install Buildr 1.4.1. >>>> >> >>>> >> Other steps I took that might or might not have affected the outcome >>>> >> of the install >>>> >> - use 32bit JDK instead of 64bit >>>> >> - set JAVA_HOME to 8.3 character file name, e.g. >>>> >> c:\progra~2\java\jdk1.6.0_21 >>>> >> - install Ruby into a directory path that does not contain spaces >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Hope my email will help other Buildr/Ruby noobs and/or maybe help >>>> >> solve the dependency problem (if there actually is one ;)) >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Samuel Ecko >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >> >
