Sorry, I forget to say, this is running on camel 2.2;

I have checked the camel's document and source-code; the camel-document say
" try-catch will disable the error-handler"; but while I checking the
source-code of camel , it only disable  error-handlers of node (which is
conjunction with doTry pattern).

 In the following example, only <filter> processor is conjunction with
<doTry>. So only filter processor's  error-handler is disabled. But
error-handlers of  other processor which defined inside filter is not
disabled.

So the catch-clause is not invoked. Is it a bug?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow route use a default-error-handler for the route, and also defined  a
custom exception handle logic using try-catch-pattern. 

But if the "myProcessRaiseError" raised exception the catch-clause cannot be
invoked; Why? Is it camel's bug?


<route>
      <from uri="ws:... "/>
         <bean ...>
        <doTry>
         <filter>
                <simple>${body} == 'firstChoice'</simple>
                      <bean ref="myProcess" />
                      <bean ref="myProcessRaiseError"/>
              </filter>
                <doCatch>
                        ..some error handler...
                </doCatch>
        </doTry>
     <process ...>
</route>






Reply via email to