On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 7:30 AM, ext2 <x...@tongtech.com> wrote: > Sorry, I forget to say, this is running on camel 2.2; > > I have checked the camel's document and source-code; the camel-document say > " try-catch will disable the error-handler"; but while I checking the > source-code of camel , it only disable error-handlers of node (which is > conjunction with doTry pattern). > > In the following example, only <filter> processor is conjunction with > <doTry>. So only filter processor's error-handler is disabled. But > error-handlers of other processor which defined inside filter is not > disabled. > > So the catch-clause is not invoked. Is it a bug? >
I have created a ticket to look into it https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2577 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Follow route use a default-error-handler for the route, and also defined a > custom exception handle logic using try-catch-pattern. > > But if the "myProcessRaiseError" raised exception the catch-clause cannot be > invoked; Why? Is it camel's bug? > > > <route> > <from uri="ws:... "/> > <bean ...> > <doTry> > <filter> > <simple>${body} == 'firstChoice'</simple> > <bean ref="myProcess" /> > <bean ref="myProcessRaiseError"/> > </filter> > <doCatch> > ..some error handler... > </doCatch> > </doTry> > <process ...> > </route> > > > > > > > -- Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
