On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > Maybe we should make sure you can use .id("xxx") as the rest of the > DSL with an inlined anonym as well. > I actually don't know if you can do that. But I can check it out :) >
Works fine see http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1005791&view=rev > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Ade <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Is it possible to give an anonymous inline Processor an identity using a Java >> annotation? Am thinking that this would be great for trace or audit >> purposes, where you want a tracer or interceptor to log/audit that a >> particular processor on the route has been invoked. >> >> I'm not sure if you can put an annotation on an inline anonymous class; >> however, we could perhaps simply annotate the process() method. Something >> like this: >> >> >> from("...") >> .process(new Processor() { >> �...@processor(label = "doImportantStuff") >> public void process(Exchange ex) throws Exception { >> } >> }); >> >> >> Does such an annotation exist in Camel? If not, then do you think this is a >> good idea? >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Giving-anonymous-processors-an-identity-is-there-an-annoation-for-that-tp3204380p3204380.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > Apache Camel Committer > > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ > Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus > -- Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
