Any Victorian Bitters I encountered, I swiftly quaffed ;)
On 08/10/2010 13:05, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Adrian Trenaman<[email protected]> wrote:
Sweet!
Very, very nice. Thanks Claus! Am now compelled to buy you a beer at the
FUSE Community Day in Paris next week :)
Cool didn't you bring back some Victorian Bitters from down under ?
But hey I bet everybody got reasons to buy a round of beer.
On 08/10/2010 12:59, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Claus Ibsen<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi
Maybe we should make sure you can use .id("xxx") as the rest of the
DSL with an inlined anonym as well.
I actually don't know if you can do that. But I can check it out :)
Works fine see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1005791&view=rev
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Ade<[email protected]>
wrote:
Is it possible to give an anonymous inline Processor an identity using a
Java
annotation? Am thinking that this would be great for trace or audit
purposes, where you want a tracer or interceptor to log/audit that a
particular processor on the route has been invoked.
I'm not sure if you can put an annotation on an inline anonymous class;
however, we could perhaps simply annotate the process() method.
Something
like this:
from("...")
.process(new Processor() {
@Processor(label = "doImportantStuff")
public void process(Exchange ex) throws Exception {
}
});
Does such an annotation exist in Camel? If not, then do you think this
is a
good idea?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Giving-anonymous-processors-an-identity-is-there-an-annoation-for-that-tp3204380p3204380.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
