Hi The issue has now been fixed on trunk.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for raising this issue. It looks like a bug in the multicast logic > when having exceptions handled by onException as well. > If you dont have the onException it should work. > > A workaround is to fix the UseLatestAggregationStrategy to ensure the > exception is propagated as well. > > I have raised a ticket > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-3352 > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Mark Borner <mark.bor...@zurich.com.au>wrote: > >> >> Hello all: >> >> Can someone help me with the behaviour of multicast() when exceptions are >> thrown? I've attached a unit test & Spring context to outline my question. >> >> What I'm expecting is that all unit tests pass. What I'm experiencing is >> that unit test "end1FailureTest" doesn't pass. And I don't understand why. >> Why would the behaviour be different if the first endpoint of a multicast() >> throws an exception versus the second? >> >> I've executed the unit test under Camel 2.4 and 2.5 with the same results. >> >> Any help is appreciated! >> Mark >> >> Mark Borner >> Java Developer - ZStream Xpress >> >> >> >> >> >> ---- >> This email is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain >> information which is confidential, commercially sensitive, or >> copyright. If you are not the intended recipient you must not >> reproduce or distribute any part of the email, disclose its contents, >> or take any action in reliance. If you have received this email in >> error, please contact the sender and delete the message. It is your >> responsibility to scan this email and any attachments for viruses and >> other defects. To the extent permitted by law, Zurich and its >> associates will not be liable for any loss or damage arising in any >> way from this communication including any file attachments. We may >> monitor email you send to us, either as a reply to this email or any >> email you send to us, to confirm our systems are protected and for >> compliance with company policies. Although we take reasonable >> precautions to protect the confidentiality of our email systems, we >> do not warrant the confidentiality or security of email or >> attachments we receive. >> >> > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > FuseSource > Email: cib...@fusesource.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: davsclaus > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ > > > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
