Thanks Claus! Mark Mark Borner Java Developer - ZStream Xpress
From: Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> To: users@camel.apache.org Date: 23/11/2010 01:00 AM Subject: Re: Multicast() Behaviour with Exceptions Hi Thanks for raising this issue. It looks like a bug in the multicast logic when having exceptions handled by onException as well. If you dont have the onException it should work. A workaround is to fix the UseLatestAggregationStrategy to ensure the exception is propagated as well. I have raised a ticket https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-3352 On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Mark Borner <mark.bor...@zurich.com.au> wrote: Hello all: Can someone help me with the behaviour of multicast() when exceptions are thrown? I've attached a unit test & Spring context to outline my question. What I'm expecting is that all unit tests pass. What I'm experiencing is that unit test "end1FailureTest" doesn't pass. And I don't understand why. Why would the behaviour be different if the first endpoint of a multicast() throws an exception versus the second? I've executed the unit test under Camel 2.4 and 2.5 with the same results. Any help is appreciated! Mark Mark Borner Java Developer - ZStream Xpress ---- This email is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain information which is confidential, commercially sensitive, or copyright. If you are not the intended recipient you must not reproduce or distribute any part of the email, disclose its contents, or take any action in reliance. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender and delete the message. It is your responsibility to scan this email and any attachments for viruses and other defects. To the extent permitted by law, Zurich and its associates will not be liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this communication including any file attachments. We may monitor email you send to us, either as a reply to this email or any email you send to us, to confirm our systems are protected and for compliance with company policies. Although we take reasonable precautions to protect the confidentiality of our email systems, we do not warrant the confidentiality or security of email or attachments we receive. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ ---- This email is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain information which is confidential, commercially sensitive, or copyright. If you are not the intended recipient you must not reproduce or distribute any part of the email, disclose its contents, or take any action in reliance. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender and delete the message. It is your responsibility to scan this email and any attachments for viruses and other defects. To the extent permitted by law, Zurich and its associates will not be liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this communication including any file attachments. We may monitor email you send to us, either as a reply to this email or any email you send to us, to confirm our systems are protected and for compliance with company policies. Although we take reasonable precautions to protect the confidentiality of our email systems, we do not warrant the confidentiality or security of email or attachments we receive.
