agreed...I'll update the patch. While we are at it, are there any other cases that should be addressed?
bvahdat wrote: > > I think that not only Double.NaN should be catched but also Float.NaN. > ----- Ben O'Day IT Consultant -http://benoday.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XPath-for-an-Integer-tp4422095p4429030.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
