On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:44 PM, boday <[email protected]> wrote: > agreed...I'll update the patch. While we are at it, are there any other > cases that should be addressed? >
I wonder if BigDecimal has any similar NaN stuff? > > bvahdat wrote: >> >> I think that not only Double.NaN should be catched but also Float.NaN. >> > > > ----- > Ben O'Day > IT Consultant -http://benoday.blogspot.com > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/XPath-for-an-Integer-tp4422095p4429030.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: [email protected] Web: http://fusesource.com CamelOne 2011: http://fusesource.com/camelone2011/ Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
