No, it is not rolling back if you use the Handles element with a constant value of true. If you use the Continue element then I believe it will roll back.
Sent from my iPod On Jun 7, 2012, at 11:46 PM, "James Carman [via Camel]" <ml-node+s465427n5714151...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Your transaction isn't rolling back if you "handle" the exception, is it? > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:21 PM, gramanero <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > I have tested the case of using a route specific onException clause within > > a > > transaction and it appears to work as I would expect (or hope). So I have a > > route that is transactional and the final endpoint in the route throws an > > exception I forced my restful service to just throw an exception). Without > > the onException clause the message lands back in the queue as you would > > expect due to it running within a transaction. With the onException clause, > > I look for specific exceptions and if it is one of the exceptions that I > > have specified I tell tell Camel that the exception has been "handled" (via > > the handled clause) and I route the message to the dead letter queue, thus > > moving the "bad message" out of the way of the messages remaining on the > > queue. I think the key here is the use of the "handled" clause that tells > > Camel that the message has been handled and therefore to NOT rollback the > > transaction. The alternative choice is to tell Camel to "continue" on with > > its normal processing which would have rolled back the transaction and put > > the message back onto the queue (via the "continue" clause...at least I > > think it is a clause). > > > > Hope that helps. > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Transacted-vs-DeadLetterQueue-tp5713992p5714139.html > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Transacted-vs-DeadLetterQueue-tp5713992p5714151.html > To unsubscribe from Transacted vs DeadLetterQueue, click here. > NAML -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Transacted-vs-DeadLetterQueue-tp5713992p5714179.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
