Try it with client cache control. Take a look at my example.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:47 AM, gramanero <graman...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, it is not rolling back if you use the Handles element with a constant > value of true. If you use the Continue element then I believe it will roll > back. > > Sent from my iPod > > On Jun 7, 2012, at 11:46 PM, "James Carman [via Camel]" > <ml-node+s465427n5714151...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > >> Your transaction isn't rolling back if you "handle" the exception, is it? >> >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:21 PM, gramanero <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > I have tested the case of using a route specific onException clause within >> > a >> > transaction and it appears to work as I would expect (or hope). So I have a >> > route that is transactional and the final endpoint in the route throws an >> > exception I forced my restful service to just throw an exception). Without >> > the onException clause the message lands back in the queue as you would >> > expect due to it running within a transaction. With the onException clause, >> > I look for specific exceptions and if it is one of the exceptions that I >> > have specified I tell tell Camel that the exception has been "handled" (via >> > the handled clause) and I route the message to the dead letter queue, thus >> > moving the "bad message" out of the way of the messages remaining on the >> > queue. I think the key here is the use of the "handled" clause that tells >> > Camel that the message has been handled and therefore to NOT rollback the >> > transaction. The alternative choice is to tell Camel to "continue" on with >> > its normal processing which would have rolled back the transaction and put >> > the message back onto the queue (via the "continue" clause...at least I >> > think it is a clause). >> > >> > Hope that helps. >> > >> > -- >> > View this message in context: >> > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Transacted-vs-DeadLetterQueue-tp5713992p5714139.html >> > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >> below: >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Transacted-vs-DeadLetterQueue-tp5713992p5714151.html >> To unsubscribe from Transacted vs DeadLetterQueue, click here. >> NAML > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Transacted-vs-DeadLetterQueue-tp5713992p5714179.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
