I'm just curious - how is this any better/different that camel-freemarker? What are the advantages? I ask because am using camel-freemarker and am having the following issue with Freemarker:
POJOs correspond to records in a document, normally you pass a collection of POJOs into Freemarker to get the output document. The issue I face is the size of the document could be gigantic/undetermined, so in my route, everything is streamed record-by-record - reading in the whole document into memory is not an option, therefore I was not able to use the "freemarker://" component and had to write yet another custom processor which opens (with append=true) writes and closes the output file on every record, since the number of records is unknown - this works except it's probably not efficient and I get spurious blank lines. Would your "Handlerbar" and/or "Mustache" template solution handle this record-streaming scenario, or does the whole input have to be read into memory also? Thanks, Chris On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, gquintana <gerald.quint...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Just for the fun, I wrote Camel components using Mustache or Handlebars > templating engines: > https://github.com/gquintana/camel-stuff > > Cheers, > Gérald > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Mustache-Handlebars-components-tp5734043.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
