Oh, I see, ok. Actually, upon further thinking, instead of wrapping the in-memory object graph in "SimpleHash" - there's an interface called "TemplateModelIterator", where, I think I could implement it such that the iterator returned would be an iterator whose next() could return a "TemplateModel" representing the current record and have a special end-of-group record that signals next() to return null, thus closing the file. I haven't tried that, but hopefully it will work.
I see what you're saying about having a single client-side and server-side template language. Thanks, Chris On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:52 AM, gquintana <gerald.quint...@gmail.com> wrote: > No these components won't help you, they work exactly like FreeMarker. On > Mustache Java, I think you can customize the way your object graph is walked > when rendering the template (see BaseObjectHandler). But the whole message > must fit in memory. > > I produced theses components because I am using Handlebars on the client > side (in JavaScript) and I didn't want to introduce another templating > language. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Mustache-Handlebars-components-tp5734043p5734068.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
