First, camel-jms component works as a JMS client not the JMS Broker implementation. Camel LoadBalancer provide a failover feature , but it doesn’t support master/salver feature out of box.
Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Nov 2, 2013, at 7:45 AM, pmp.martins <pmp.mart...@campus.fct.unl.pt> wrote: > Alright, so let me check if I understand. > Camel needs a JMS implementation. For that I can either choose ActiveMQ or > the camel-jms-component correct? > Well, I am working in a project that uses ActiveMQ, so I will stick with > that. > > Now, if I have a Camel project with ActiveMQ, I will have the Loadbalancer > with the failover feature right? > If not, does it mean that I am forced to use Fuse? > > Thanks for the clarifications, you're helping a lot ! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742532.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
