Ok... so I am still struggling with understanding some of Camel's main features and limitations.
My objective is to implement a demo application that can migrate camel endpoints. To achieve this everyone suggested that I should use the camel load-balancer pattern with the failover construct (so far so good). To achieve this objective you have suggested Fuse and ActiveMQ. Some have even suggested JBoss, but I am lost. I understand that Camel needs the an implementation of a JMS server. To achieve this I can use ActiveMQ - a free implementation of a JMS server. However camel also provides the jms-component, which is an implementation of a jms-client. In my specific case (I use ACtiveMQ) should I not be using an ActiveMQ client for JMS? Could someone provide a working example? With ActiveMQ and JMS understood I can then try to find out why people suggest Fuse. I want my implementation to be as simple as possible. Why do I need Fuse? The Camel+ActiveMQ combination has the load balancer pattern with the failover mechanism right? Thanks for all the help, but I really need to understand the basics before charging anything else :P -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742538.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
