What way more issues do you see in the build? Il mar 2 nov 2021, 21:44 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> Hi Steve, > > Some ASF projects use it but the IDE setup step is reducing a bit > contributions - even if I can agree camel build has way more issues - but > since lombok is far to be mainstream - and it will be worse with java 17 - > I guess it is part of the story there, but no legal issue AFAIK. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le mar. 2 nov. 2021 à 21:40, Steve973 <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Ok. Thanks, Claus. Do you mind explaining the rationale behind this? > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:39 PM Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > We will not use lombock > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 21.23, Steve973 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello. I normally use lombok to take care of boiler plate code in > > > projects > > > > that I work on. I have noticed that lombok is not used in the camel > > code > > > > base. Is there something about it (licensing or something else) that > > > makes > > > > it unsuitable for camel? I am working on something in camel-core, > and > > it > > > > would be great to be able to use it to keep things cleaner. But I > > would > > > > think that if it was acceptable in an apache project, people would > > > already > > > > be using it. Does anyone have the details on this? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Steve > > > > > > > -- > > > Claus Ibsen > > > ----------------- > > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > > > > > >
