This all becomes rather moot at the moment when Claus says, "We will not
use Lombok.". It is off the table for camel.  On all of our other
projects,  an examination of benefits and drawbacks of Lombok is a
discussion for that team. Enjoy!

On Sun, Nov 7, 2021, 8:15 AM Otavio Rodolfo Piske <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I'd be interested in hearing about these problems too.
>
> Depending on what they are and if there's enough* of those, we could even
> create some tickets on Jira to acknowledge and track the progress. It would
> certainly help to fix them - supposing it's something there's consensus
> about.
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 10:14 PM Andrea Cosentino <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > What way more issues do you see in the build?
> >
> > Il mar 2 nov 2021, 21:44 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > > Hi Steve,
> > >
> > > Some ASF projects use it but the IDE setup step is reducing a bit
> > > contributions - even if I can agree camel build has way more issues -
> but
> > > since lombok is far to be mainstream - and it will be worse with java
> 17
> > -
> > > I guess it is part of the story there, but no legal issue AFAIK.
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Le mar. 2 nov. 2021 à 21:40, Steve973 <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Ok.  Thanks, Claus.  Do you mind explaining the rationale behind
> this?
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:39 PM Claus Ibsen <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We will not use lombock
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 21.23, Steve973 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello.  I normally use lombok to take care of boiler plate code
> in
> > > > > projects
> > > > > > that I work on.  I have noticed that lombok is not used in the
> > camel
> > > > code
> > > > > > base.  Is there something about it (licensing or something else)
> > that
> > > > > makes
> > > > > > it unsuitable for camel?  I am working on something in
> camel-core,
> > > and
> > > > it
> > > > > > would be great to be able to use it to keep things cleaner.  But
> I
> > > > would
> > > > > > think that if it was acceptable in an apache project, people
> would
> > > > > already
> > > > > > be using it.  Does anyone have the details on this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Steve
> > > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Claus Ibsen
> > > > > -----------------
> > > > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> > > > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Otavio R. Piske
> http://orpiske.net
>

Reply via email to