I was echoing Andrea’s question about our build having way more issues. Not about Lombok - I am not a fan of it as well.
Otavio R. Piske > On Nov 7, 2021, at 20:21, Steve973 <[email protected]> wrote: > This all becomes rather moot at the moment when Claus says, "We will not > use Lombok.". It is off the table for camel. On all of our other > projects, an examination of benefits and drawbacks of Lombok is a > discussion for that team. Enjoy! > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2021, 8:15 AM Otavio Rodolfo Piske <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'd be interested in hearing about these problems too. >> >> Depending on what they are and if there's enough* of those, we could even >> create some tickets on Jira to acknowledge and track the progress. It would >> certainly help to fix them - supposing it's something there's consensus >> about. >> >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 10:14 PM Andrea Cosentino <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> What way more issues do you see in the build? >>> Il mar 2 nov 2021, 21:44 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> ha >>> scritto: >>>> Hi Steve, >>>> Some ASF projects use it but the IDE setup step is reducing a bit >>>> contributions - even if I can agree camel build has way more issues - >> but >>>> since lombok is far to be mainstream - and it will be worse with java >> 17 >>> - >>>> I guess it is part of the story there, but no legal issue AFAIK. >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>> < >> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>> Le mar. 2 nov. 2021 à 21:40, Steve973 <[email protected]> a écrit : >>>>> Ok. Thanks, Claus. Do you mind explaining the rationale behind >> this? >>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:39 PM Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> We will not use lombock >>>>>> On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 21.23, Steve973 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Hello. I normally use lombok to take care of boiler plate code >> in >>>>>> projects >>>>>>> that I work on. I have noticed that lombok is not used in the >>> camel >>>>> code >>>>>>> base. Is there something about it (licensing or something else) >>> that >>>>>> makes >>>>>>> it unsuitable for camel? I am working on something in >> camel-core, >>>> and >>>>> it >>>>>>> would be great to be able to use it to keep things cleaner. But >> I >>>>> would >>>>>>> think that if it was acceptable in an apache project, people >> would >>>>>> already >>>>>>> be using it. Does anyone have the details on this? >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Steve >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Claus Ibsen >>>>>> ----------------- >>>>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>>>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >> >> >> -- >> Otavio R. Piske >> http://orpiske.net
