Hello Jayapal,

Where is the nics tables, is it inside the router?  Or in the CloudStack
configuration?


Thank you very much.


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> cmdline is having the correct config for eth2.
> But router received command with interface eth3 instead of eth2, some
> thing is wrong here.
>
> Please see what is device_id for the nic with the public ip in 'nics'
> table.
>
> One possibility can be hypervisor might returning wrong device id for the
> public interface.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
>
> On 11-Jun-2013, at 4:12 PM, wq meng <wqm...@gmail.com>
>  wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here is the cmdline file and the logs from message file, there is
> something
> > tell that cloud setup eth3 with rules.
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/4WvpukKW
> >
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:11 PM, wq meng <wqm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Should be there is something not work as expected when some situation,
> >> with this script ?
> >>
> >> /etc/init.d/cloud-early-config
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you very much.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:59 PM, wq meng <wqm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Not sure why, is there a solution?
> >>>
> >>> Here is the new result, after create a new V-router.
> >>>
> >>> This time, the eth4 is disappear .  But eth3 still there.
> >>>
> >>> Why???
> >>>
> >>> http://pastebin.com/G0NjNCuA
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank you very much.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
> >>> jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> * packets are going out WITHOUT  NAT and in reply the packets are not
> >>>> reaching private ip address.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> Jayapal
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11-Jun-2013, at 2:56 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
> >>>> jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you observe in your router there 3 public interfaces with the same
> >>>> IP address.
> >>>>> The outbound/egress traffic is passing from eth0 to eth2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The iptables nat SNAT rule is  not there on the eth2, but the rules
> >>>> are on the eth3 and eth4 interface.
> >>>>> So the packets are going out without NAT and in reply the packets are
> >>>> not reaching back.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So please check why you router has multiple SNAT ip addresses.
> >>>>> Try destroying router and see the router is coming up one public
> >>>> interface eth2 or not.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. Interfaces with same ip address
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1.
> >>>>> eth2      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 06:74:78:00:00:a2
> >>>>> 2.
> >>>>>         inet addr:198.105.191.145  Bcast:198.105.191.255
> >>>> Mask:255.255.255.0
> >>>>> 3.
> >>>>> 4.
> >>>>> 5.
> >>>>> eth3      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 06:6f:64:00:00:a2
> >>>>> 6.
> >>>>>         inet addr:198.105.191.145  Bcast:198.105.191.255
> >>>> Mask:255.255.255.0
> >>>>> 7.
> >>>>> 8.
> >>>>> 9.
> >>>>> eth4      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 06:1e:c4:00:00:a2
> >>>>> 10.
> >>>>>         inet addr:198.105.191.145  Bcast:198.105.191.255
> >>>> Mask:255.255.255.0
> >>>>> 11.
> >>>>> 12.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2. Here traffic is accepted on eth0 to eth2 (179 packets)
> >>>>> 179 15036 FW_OUTBOUND  all  --  eth0   eth2    0.0.0.0/0
> >>>> 0.0.0.0/0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 3. In iptables nat table doesn't have the SNAT rule to nat the
> traffic.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1.
> >>>>> Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 5 packets, 616 bytes)
> >>>>> 2.
> >>>>> pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
> >>>> destination
> >>>>> 3.
> >>>>>   0     0 SNAT       all  --  *      eth3    0.0.0.0/0
> >>>> 0.0.0.0/0           to:198.105.191.145
> >>>>> 4.
> >>>>>   0     0 SNAT       all  --  *      eth4    0.0.0.0/0
> >>>> 0.0.0.0/0           to:198.105.191.145
> >>>>> 5.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Jayapal
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 10-Jun-2013, at 11:16 PM, wq meng <wqm...@gmail.com<mailto:
> >>>> wqm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello Jayapal,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Setup details is that only 1 PC,  with 1 network interface. eth1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I add br0 to eth1, and br0:0 to eth1.  br0 work as KVM tag for mgmt.
> >>>>> add eth1.1200 as the public VLan, 1200 is public vlan tag,
> >>>>> add eth1.1300 as the guest Vlan,  1300 is the guest vlan tag.
> >>>>> add cloudVirBr1200 to eth1.1200,  KVM tag for* public* is
> >>>> cloudVirBr1200
> >>>>> add cloudVirBr1300 to eth1.1300,  KVM tag for private is
> cloudVirBr1300
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is the IP ranges.
> >>>>> http://pastebin.com/uZBpx0Lr
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is how the NIC and bridges configuration on the Computer.
> >>>>> http://pastebin.com/86jRex72
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is the result from the v-router.
> >>>>> http://pastebin.com/dcDUuyP7
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you very much.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
> >>>>> jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In advanced zone you can use openVswitch.
> >>>>> Please share setup details like hypervisor, public ip range.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Did you deploy vm with default network offering ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please share your below commands output on router via pastebin.com
> >>>>> Iptables -L -nv
> >>>>> Iptables -t nat -L -nv
> >>>>> Iptables -t mangle -L -nv
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ifconfig
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lets figure out  is there any problem in cloudstack configuration.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Jayapal
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: wq meng [mailto:wqm...@gmail.com]
> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, 9 June 2013 1:43 AM
> >>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: allow outbound access by default on virtual routers
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello Jayapal,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Seems the problem exist in CS4.1.0 too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And I have tried the same NAT rule, not work.
> >>>>> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.1.1.0/24 -o eth2 -j SNAT --to
> >>>>> xxx.105.191.147
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Should use OpenvSwich?  Is the OpenvSwitch is recommend?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:01 AM, wq meng <wqm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello Jayapal,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I add a iptables rule
> >>>>>
> >>>>> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.1.1.0/24 -o eth2 -j SNAT --to
> >>>>> xxx.105.191.147
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And it seems works now.  I can ping Google inside the Guest VM.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just a few questions,  Why in my VR-VM, it have  eth3, eth4?  Where
> >>>>> are they come from,  in the interface file, there is not
> configuration
> >>>>> for eth3 and eth4 at all.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sometimes, I reboot the VR-VM, the eth4 is disappear, only left eth3,
> >>>>> but as you can know, it still not work, As eth3 is not a NIC at all.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Then maybe the VR-VM have some buggy scripts when the VR-VM start ,
> >>>>> and which mis-configuration the NICs and also the NAT rules for
> >>>>> VRouter?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As the CS4.1 will be release soon on Monday,  I am not sure, if it
> >>>>> need spend more time to look deep.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you very much.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 6:38 PM, wq meng <wqm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry for the delay,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is the NAT table. Please check.
> >>>>> The xxx.105.191.147 IP is the public IP for the VRouter-VM.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> root@r-6-VM:~# iptables -t nat -L -nv Chain PREROUTING (policy
> ACCEPT
> >>>>> 258 packets, 13822 bytes)
> >>>>> pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
> >>>>> destination
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 4 packets, 532 bytes)
> >>>>> pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
> >>>>> destination
> >>>>>  0     0 SNAT       all  --  *      eth3    0.0.0.0/0
> >>>>> 0.0.0.0/0           to:xxx.105.191.147
> >>>>>  0     0 SNAT       all  --  *      eth4    0.0.0.0/0
> >>>>> 0.0.0.0/0           to:xxx.105.191.147
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 3 packets, 448 bytes)
> >>>>> pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
> >>>>> destination
> >>>>>
> >>>>> root@r-6-VM:~#
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks a lot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
> >>>>> jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From the  packet captures on eth2,  the vm IP seems to be  not NATed.
> >>>>> 13:39:41.991966 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request, id
> >>>>> 56879, seq 126, length 64
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can you also share iptables -t nat -L -nv output.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Jayapal
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: wq meng [mailto:wqm...@gmail.com]
> >>>>> Sent: Friday, 24 May 2013 7:13 PM
> >>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: allow outbound access by default on virtual routers
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello Jayapal
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I ping google.com on the Guest VM,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is the dump data from the router - VM.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please review.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And the 2.*.2 is public IP, which I replace to the real ip.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you very much.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> root@r-7-VM:~#
> >>>>> root@r-7-VM:~# tcpdump  -i  eth0 -nq
> >>>>> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full
> >>>>> protocol
> >>>>> decode
> >>>>> listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535
> >>>>> bytes
> >>>>> 13:38:52.979198 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 77, length 64
> >>>>> 13:38:53.979203 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 78, length 64
> >>>>> 13:38:54.979205 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 79, length 64
> >>>>> 13:38:55.978182 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 80, length 64
> >>>>> 13:38:56.979188 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 81, length 64
> >>>>> 13:38:57.979299 ARP, Request who-has 10.1.1.1 tell 10.1.1.4,
> >>>>> length 28
> >>>>> 13:38:57.979307 ARP, Reply 10.1.1.1 is-at 02:00:00:b1:00:05,
> >>>>> length 28
> >>>>> 13:38:57.979315 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 82, length 64
> >>>>> 13:38:58.979250 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 83, length 64
> >>>>> 13:38:59.979297 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 84, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:00.979313 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 85, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:01.978311 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 86, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:02.979282 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 87, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:03.979323 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 88, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:04.979315 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 89, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:05.979364 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 90, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:06.979420 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 91, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:07.978421 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 92, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:08.978432 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 93, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:09.979447 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 94, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:10.979437 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 95, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:11.979474 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 96, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:12.979473 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 97, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:13.978525 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 98, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:14.978535 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 99, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:15.979562 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 100, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:16.979575 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 101, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:17.979602 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 102, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:18.979584 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 103, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:19.988541 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 104, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:20.988615 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 105, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:21.988598 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 106, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:22.989582 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 107, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:23.989666 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 108, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:24.989695 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 109, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:25.989725 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 110, length 64 ^C
> >>>>> 36 packets captured
> >>>>> 36 packets received by filter
> >>>>> 0 packets dropped by kernel
> >>>>> root@r-7-VM:~# tcpdump  -i eth2 -nq
> >>>>> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full
> >>>>> protocol
> >>>>> decode
> >>>>> listening on eth2, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535
> >>>>> bytes
> >>>>> 13:39:38.380208 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.22 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:38.982570 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:39:38.987877 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.35 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:38.991937 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 123, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:39.194709 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.22 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:39.599296 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.35 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:39.904508 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.22 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:39.991931 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 124, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:40.417287 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.35 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:40.730305 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.22 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:40.982552 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:39:40.991980 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 125, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:41.337501 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.35 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:41.437224 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.22 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:41.991966 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 126, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:42.903756 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.248 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:42.982539 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:39:42.992996 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 127, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:43.682772 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.248 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:43.993009 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 128, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:44.502714 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.248 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:44.509679 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.228 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:44.585413 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.70 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:44.982554 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:39:44.993017 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 129, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:45.160097 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.53 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:45.215168 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.70 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:45.318277 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.228 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:45.325738 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.34 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:45.421375 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.248 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:45.826574 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.70 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:45.928821 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.228 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:45.930246 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.53 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:45.993039 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 130, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:46.030400 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.248 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:46.031609 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.34 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:46.349636 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.3 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:46.439927 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.70 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:46.486265 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.32 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:46.541822 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.228 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:46.850884 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.53 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:46.952230 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.34 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:46.982553 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:39:46.993050 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 131, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:47.051629 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.70 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:47.154197 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.228 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:47.155893 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.3 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:47.258228 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.32 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:47.459210 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.53 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:47.561218 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.34 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:47.970622 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.32 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:47.971612 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.3 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:47.993074 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 132, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:48.380271 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.34 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:48.381173 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.53 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:48.581498 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.32 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:48.890259 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.3 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:48.982519 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:39:48.994081 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 133, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:49.290934 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.42 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:49.302649 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.32 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:49.433752 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.116 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:49.812965 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.3 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:49.994099 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 134, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:50.014695 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.42 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:50.118276 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.116 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:50.933507 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.116 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:50.934227 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.42 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:50.982526 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:39:50.994092 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 135, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:51.643878 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.42 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:51.848044 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.116 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:51.994151 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 136, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:52.452001 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.116 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:39:52.453417 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.42 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:52.982496 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:39:52.994150 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 137, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:53.994171 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 138, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:54.982573 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:39:54.994188 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 139, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:55.995186 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 140, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:56.982561 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:39:56.995215 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 141, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:57.991661 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.1 tell 2.*.2.25, length
> >>>>> 28
> >>>>> 13:39:57.992092 ARP, Reply 2.*.2.1 is-at 5c:5e:ab:da:b9:c0, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:39:57.995220 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 142, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:58.982566 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:39:58.995244 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 143, length 64
> >>>>> 13:39:59.995280 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 144, length 64
> >>>>> 13:40:00.417613 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.4 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:40:00.982547 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:40:00.995274 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 145, length 64
> >>>>> 13:40:01.170853 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.4 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:40:01.996303 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 146, length 64
> >>>>> 13:40:02.074725 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.4 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:40:02.359140 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.161 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:40:02.982500 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:40:02.985123 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.4 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:40:02.996303 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 147, length 64
> >>>>> 13:40:03.186378 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.161 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:40:03.417268 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.20 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:40:03.699414 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.4 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:40:03.996329 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 148, length 64
> >>>>> 13:40:03.998677 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.161 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:40:04.301363 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.20 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:40:04.432828 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.115 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:40:04.435467 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.23 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:40:04.820262 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.161 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:40:04.920378 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.20 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:40:04.982690 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
> >>>>> 8000.00:25:90:a4:98:3e.8004, length 35
> >>>>> 13:40:04.996336 IP 10.1.1.4 > 74.125.224.228: ICMP echo request,
> >>>>> id
> >>>>> 56879,
> >>>>> seq 149, length 64
> >>>>> 13:40:05.124674 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.23 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:40:05.124678 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.115 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> 13:40:05.399662 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.12 tell 2.*.2.1, length
> >>>>> 42
> >>>>> 13:40:05.429940 ARP, Request who-has 2.*.2.161 tell 2.*.2.1,
> >>>>> length 42
> >>>>> ^C
> >>>>> 115 packets captured
> >>>>> 115 packets received by filter
> >>>>> 0 packets dropped by kernel
> >>>>> root@r-7-VM:~#
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> >>>>> <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Iptables rules are looking fine.
> >>>>> Can you please do the following.
> >>>>> 1. ping google.com from vm
> >>>>> 2. run the tcpdump command on the router eth0, eth2  and see the
> >>>>> packets are reaching to guest interface
> >>>>>  tcpdump  -i  eth0 -nq
> >>>>> tcpdump  -i eth2 -nq
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If guest vm icmp packets are not reaching to eth0 and eth2 then
> >>>>> there is
> >>>>> issue in your network setup.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Jayapal
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: wq meng [mailto:wqm...@gmail.com]
> >>>>> Sent: Friday, 24 May 2013 1:27 AM
> >>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: allow outbound access by default on virtual
> >>>>> routers
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Have you tried this and get this to work?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think I have the same problem just can not get the Guest VM
> >>>>> to access outbound by the V-router vm.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> my guest NIC is eth0, the public NIC is eth2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is the default rules in the Router VM.  How to apply the
> >>>>> rules to get the Guest VM can access outbound?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could you help me to show how?   I have tried many times, just
> >>>>> no
> >>>>> luck of
> >>>>> it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you very much.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> root@r-7-VM:~# cat /etc/iptables/rules
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one #
> >>>>> or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file #
> >>>>> distributed with this work for additional information #
> >>>>> regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file # to
> >>>>> you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the # "License");
> >>>>> you may not use this
> >>>>> file
> >>>>> except in compliance # with the License.
> >>>>> You may obtain a copy of the License at #
> >>>>> #   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> >>>>> #
> >>>>> # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, #
> >>>>> software distributed under the License is distributed on an #
> >>>>> "AS
> >>>>> IS"
> >>>>> BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY # KIND,
> >>>>> either
> >>>>> express or implied.
> >>>>> See the License for the # specific language governing
> >>>>> permissions
> >>>>> and
> >>>>> limitations # under the License.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *nat
> >>>>> :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
> >>>>> :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
> >>>>> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> >>>>> COMMIT
> >>>>> *filter
> >>>>> :INPUT DROP [0:0]
> >>>>> :FORWARD DROP [0:0]
> >>>>> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> >>>>> -A INPUT -d 224.0.0.18/32 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -d 225.0.0.50/32
> >>>>> -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> >>>>> -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i
> >>>>> eth1 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i
> >>>>> eth2 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p
> >>>>> icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth0 -p udp
> >>>>> -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth0 -p udp -m udp
> >>>>> --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth1 -p tcp -m state --state
> >>>>> NEW --dport 3922 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -m state --
> >>>>> state NEW --dport 8080 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -m
> >>>>> state --state NEW --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o
> >>>>> eth1 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD
> >>>>> -i eth0 -o eth2 -j ACCEPT
> >>>>> -A
> >>>>> FORWARD -i eth2 -o eth0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j
> >>>>> ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth0 -m state --state NEW -j
> >>>>> ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i
> >>>>> eth0 -o eth0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
> >>>>> COMMIT *mangle :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> >>>>> :FORWARD
> >>>>> ACCEPT
> >>>>> [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] -A
> >>>>> PREROUTING
> >>>>> -m
> >>>>> state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j CONNMARK -- restore-mark
> >>>>> -A POSTROUTING -p udp --dport bootpc -j CHECKSUM --
> >>>>> checksum-fill
> >>>>> COMMIT
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> root@r-7-VM:~# ifconfig
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> >>>>> <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Currently we don't have the configurable option.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. You can add egress rule on network with protocol 'all' to
> >>>>> allow all
> >>>>> outbound traffic once the network is created.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2. If you want to allow traffic by default when ever router
> >>>>> is created One work around will be add the below line into
> >>>>> the iptables-router file
> >>>>> after the this line    -I FW_OUTBOUND -m state --state
> >>>>> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> >>>>> -j ACCEPT
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -A FW_OUTBOUND  -j ACCEPT
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Jayapal
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 20-May-2013, at 2:18 PM, Len Bellemore
> >>>>> <len.bellem...@controlcircle.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Guys
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Anyone know if it's possible to change some of the default
> >>>>> options
> >>>>> on a
> >>>>> virtual router, so that every time it gets created it has
> >>>>> particular rules?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My main issue is that I want to allow outbound access by
> >>>>> default to every
> >>>>> account.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Len
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to