I'm just building the proof of concept on my computer at home. We don't
have the budget for a test and dev environment.


On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Caleb Call <calebc...@me.com> wrote:

> We've had the same issues and besides maintaining the iptables rules
> manually (not realistic when everything else is so dynamic), our fix too
> was turning off the iptables on the XS hosts.  On top of that you have to
> run some type of check the ensure that they remain off because many things
> that you do in CS will trigger iptables to start back up and suddenly start
> blocking traffic.
>
> Ours didn't start happening until we started adding multiple zones.  Not
> sure if that was the trigger but that's when we started seeing these
> problems.  Since ours was just for our test/dev environments internally we
> didn't care too much about the security groups functionality that the
> iptables would provide, we have physical firewalls everywhere.
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Carlos Reategui <car...@reategui.com> wrote:
>
> > I had problems with a XS6.0.2 + CS4.0.1 with Basic network that were
> > "solved" by turning off iptables on the XS hosts.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Bradley Hieber <mercsni...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Iptables are turned off on management server. Ssvm is running on another
> >> machine.
> >> —
> >> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Mir Islam <mis...@mirislam.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ok, but it is clear that the ssvm is not able to mount the secondary
> >> storage. What is in the iptables on the host (I assume it is the
> management
> >> server as well) ?
> >>> On Jul 18, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Bradley Hieber wrote:
> >>>> this is a POC environment. Everything is running on a
> 192.168.2.0/24with a
> >>>> SOHO acting as DNS and gateway.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Mir Islam <mis...@mirislam.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Looks like your network is not probably setup correctly. What is your
> >>>>> topology looking like?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Jul 18, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Bradley Hieber wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> http://pastebin.com/gdTdGGBu
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Bradley Hieber <
> mercsni...@gmail.com
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No mount on /mnt/SecStorage
> >>>>>>> —
> >>>>>>> Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> for iPhone
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dean Kamali <
> dean.kam...@gmail.com
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Okay, can you open up the proxy console of your SSVM?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Mir Islam <mis...@mirislam.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Try to mount your secondary storage NFS mount point from within
> the
> >>>>>>>> SSVM.
> >>>>>>>>> There maybe some firewall rule preventing it from mounting the
> >>>>> storage.
> >>>>>>>>> Find the link local IP of the SSVM and ssh into it on port 3922
> >> using
> >>>>>>>>> identity under /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud from your host machine.
> >> Then do
> >>>>>>>> a df
> >>>>>>>>> to see if the storage on /mnt/SecStorage shows up or not.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 18, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Bradley Hieber wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> they show as running in the Infrastructure-> System VM's area,
> but
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> management logs say there is none
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2013-07-18 14:35:37,814 DEBUG
> >>>>>>>>>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
> >> (secstorage-1:null)
> >>>>>>>> Zone
> >>>>>>>>> 1
> >>>>>>>>>> is ready to launch secondary storage VM
> >>>>>>>>>> 2013-07-18 14:35:38,704 DEBUG
> >>>>>>>>> [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> >>>>>>>>>> (consoleproxy-1:null) Zone 1 is ready to launch console proxy
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Dean Kamali <
> >> dean.kam...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Did you enable your zone? If so, system VMS should get
> >> automatically
> >>>>>>>>>>> deployed
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 18, 2013 2:33 PM, "Bradley Hieber" <
> mercsni...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So I have the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ID a54fae18-ef07-11e2-b49d-000c293c698f Zone name Red Zone ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 8f59e824-a9f1-4acd-8a5c-f68ea9ced479 Description SystemVM
> >> Template
> >>>>>>>>>>>> (XenServer) Hypervisor XenServer Type SYSTEM Ready Yes Status
> >>>>>>>> Download
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Complete But I can't deploy and instance from it...thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Dean Kamali <
> >>>>> dean.kam...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> From the UI, go to templates, then you will find System VM
> >>>>>>>> template,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> click
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on it, and you should see a progress bar for download, or
> >> errors
> >>>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is an issue.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If all goes well, you should see "successfully installed" or
> >>>>>>>> "Ready"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Bradley Hieber <
> >>>>>>>> mercsni...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know if the secondary storage vm is downloading
> the
> >>>>>>>> CentOS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> template? I am seeing the following even though my SSVM is
> >>>>>>>>>>> running....
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013-07-18 14:26:07,813 DEBUG
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
> >>>>>>>> (secstorage-1:null)
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Zone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is ready to launch secondary storage VM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brad
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Brad
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Brad
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Brad
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Brad
> >>
>
>


-- 
Brad

Reply via email to