On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> The system vms need a public network, so at least 2 "public" Ips. > Can I just allocate a range of IPs within my existing 192.168.1.0/24 for this and tag it with the public VLAN id? or do I need to create a new virtual subnet? > > On 8/15/13 11:14 AM, "Carlos Reategui" <car...@reategui.com> wrote: > > >Thanks for the response. > > > >I am a complete novice when it comes to VLANs so hopefully I can pull this > >off. My hosts/guest physical network is using a Dell PowerConnect 2848 > >which says it supports VLAN tags so I'll look at its docs to see what I > >need to do to configure it. > > > >You mention that the guest and public traffic must be tagged. Since I > >will > >not be using public IPs (or the notion of a public network) can I skip the > >public network or do I need to define it? My 192.168.1.0/24 network is > >already NATed out if the guests need outbound access to the internet. > > Inbound internet traffic is not available. > > > > > > > >On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru < > >venkataswamybabu.budum...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > >> Currently CS supports security groups functionality only with bridge > >> networking mode. > >> > >> If you are ok with out security groups then with advanced shared you > >>will > >> be able to achieve what you are looking for. Advanced shared expects > >> tagged VLANs for guest and public traffic types. > >> > >> On 15/08/13 5:35 AM, "Carlos Reategui" <car...@reategui.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Hi All, > >> > > >> >The Cloudstack docs for XenServer say to use bridge networking when > >>using > >> >basic networking. Is this still the case with CS 4.1 and XS 6.1? > >> > > >> >XS 6.1 introduced LACP which I would prefer to use but it is not > >>supported > >> >with bridge networking. I think my storage network would benefit from > >>it. > >> > > >> >If still required for basic networking then can someone walk me through > >> >how > >> >to setup an advanced network that behaves like a basic, shared, no > >> >security > >> >group network. I have 8 nics in 2 bonds (4 nics each -- one labeled > >> >storage for NFS SR and the other cloud-public for management/guest > >> >traffic). The hosts and the guests are in 192.168.1.0/24 and the > >>storage > >> >network is isolated on its own in a 192.168.200.0/24. > >> > > >> >thanks, > >> >Carlos > >> > >> > >