I think it will be easier for me to stick with basic network. Can I use vSwitch with basic network if I do not use security groups?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Carlos Reategui <car...@reategui.com>wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < > chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> The system vms need a public network, so at least 2 "public" Ips. >> > > Can I just allocate a range of IPs within my existing 192.168.1.0/24 for > this and tag it with the public VLAN id? or do I need to create a new > virtual subnet? > > >> >> On 8/15/13 11:14 AM, "Carlos Reategui" <car...@reategui.com> wrote: >> >> >Thanks for the response. >> > >> >I am a complete novice when it comes to VLANs so hopefully I can pull >> this >> >off. My hosts/guest physical network is using a Dell PowerConnect 2848 >> >which says it supports VLAN tags so I'll look at its docs to see what I >> >need to do to configure it. >> > >> >You mention that the guest and public traffic must be tagged. Since I >> >will >> >not be using public IPs (or the notion of a public network) can I skip >> the >> >public network or do I need to define it? My 192.168.1.0/24 network is >> >already NATed out if the guests need outbound access to the internet. >> > Inbound internet traffic is not available. >> > >> > >> > >> >On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru < >> >venkataswamybabu.budum...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Currently CS supports security groups functionality only with bridge >> >> networking mode. >> >> >> >> If you are ok with out security groups then with advanced shared you >> >>will >> >> be able to achieve what you are looking for. Advanced shared expects >> >> tagged VLANs for guest and public traffic types. >> >> >> >> On 15/08/13 5:35 AM, "Carlos Reategui" <car...@reategui.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Hi All, >> >> > >> >> >The Cloudstack docs for XenServer say to use bridge networking when >> >>using >> >> >basic networking. Is this still the case with CS 4.1 and XS 6.1? >> >> > >> >> >XS 6.1 introduced LACP which I would prefer to use but it is not >> >>supported >> >> >with bridge networking. I think my storage network would benefit from >> >>it. >> >> > >> >> >If still required for basic networking then can someone walk me >> through >> >> >how >> >> >to setup an advanced network that behaves like a basic, shared, no >> >> >security >> >> >group network. I have 8 nics in 2 bonds (4 nics each -- one labeled >> >> >storage for NFS SR and the other cloud-public for management/guest >> >> >traffic). The hosts and the guests are in 192.168.1.0/24 and the >> >>storage >> >> >network is isolated on its own in a 192.168.200.0/24. >> >> > >> >> >thanks, >> >> >Carlos >> >> >> >> >> >> >
