Just to clarify... We are just starting to get a CS 4.1.1 install up and working. We have our management server and two XenServer 6.1 hosts.
If we create local storage SR's for each XenServer CloudStack will only recognize one of those local storage pools? We can't add the second storage pool and CloudStack will use the correct local storage for the host it's spinning a VM up on? Thanks, Travis On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:49 PM, David Ortiz <dpor...@outlook.com> wrote: > One thing to be aware of with the local storage, is that CS will only > recognize one local storage pool. So where you have 10 x 512 GB disks, you > will need to make all of the disks you would like to use for CS primary > storage one logical disk. > >> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:15:44 -0400 >> Subject: Re: Storage options for new Cloudstack setup. >> From: kirk.jant...@gmail.com >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> >> The hosts would be in a cluster, but their storage is local to the host. >> I'm not aware of anything in cloudstack yet (storage migration is slated >> for future versions) that would make it aware of replication done on the >> host level. People are experimenting with Ceph for primary storage, but I >> don't know all the details on what is/isn't possible with that. >> >> Regards, >> >> Kirk Jantzer >> http://about.me/kirkjantzer >> On Aug 16, 2013 6:04 PM, "Tyler Wilson" <k...@linuxdigital.net> wrote: >> >>> Hello Kirk, >>> >>> While I do agree with the Live migration issue I do think If you have >>> multiple hosts couldnt you replicate the data and establish HA via load >>> balancing. Am I correct in thinking this? Would these specs be considered >>> one 'pod' or a single 'cluster'? >>> >>> Thanks again for you help. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Kirk Jantzer <kirk.jant...@gmail.com >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'd wait for the experts to reply, but off the top of my head in the >>>> current versions (4.x), you'd lose the ability to live migrate instances >>>> and offer HA service offerings. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Kirk Jantzer >>>> http://about.me/kirkjantzer >>>> On Aug 16, 2013 5:49 PM, "Tyler Wilson" <k...@linuxdigital.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Kirk, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the reply, will any features be disabled/unavailable with >>> this >>>>> method? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Kirk Jantzer <kirk.jant...@gmail.com >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> With the specs provided, you'll want to create a zone with local >>>> storage >>>>>> enabled (as well as change the global setting that allows system vms >>> to >>>>> be >>>>>> placed on primary storage). That way, when you add hosts, their local >>>>> disks >>>>>> will be added as primary storage. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Kirk Jantzer >>>>>> http://about.me/kirkjantzer >>>>>> On Aug 16, 2013 3:57 PM, "Tyler Wilson" <k...@linuxdigital.net> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Greetings All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are looking into setting up Cloudstack for one of our new racks >>>> and >>>>> I >>>>>> am >>>>>>> trying to get a picture of our options for storage; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. Can we use primary storage with the specs below? It seems >>> primary >>>>>>> storage is meant for single, dedicated storage boxes (SAN, NFS) >>> that >>>>>> don't >>>>>>> house VM's as well (which is our goal). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 3x Dual E5-2620, 256 GB RAM, 10x512 GB SSD (2x10gbps) (Hosts) >>>>>>> 1x E5-2620, 64 GB RAM, 5x512 GB SSD (1gbps) (Possibly management >>>>> server) >>>>>>> 1x Dual E5-2620, 64 GB RAM, 8x1 TB SATA3 (1gbps) (possibly >>>>>> backup/secondary >>>>>>> storage server) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2. If so, how/what do we need to do to set this up? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for your help! >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
