Thanks for updating it. Without knowing what to look for in the prepare system vm template section I would not have known that it was updated. Would it make sense to have a date in the header or footer with the last content update date for a page?
Also do you know if the upgrade notes in the Release Notes doc was updated? On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:07 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > And just as a heads up, thanks for help from Prasanna and Travis, I've > published an updated version of the IG for 4.2, hopefully that at > least gets us 'installable'. > > --David > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:10 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Travis Graham <tgra...@tgraham.us> > wrote: > >> What's an acceptable/expected timeframe for rolling out the published > fixes once a patch has made it's way in? Is that something that can be > automated after a successful Jenkins run? > >> > >> Travis > >> > > > > It depends on the scope of changes. For a document like the release > > notes, assuming someone already has an updated SVN tree, it shouldn't > > take more than 30 minutes to update, and it could happen pretty > > regularly. If it's every document in a single release, that's > > historically taken the better part of a day. I don't think we'll get > > away with getting it to happen in an automated fashion, simply because > > it requires commit access to SVN, which is tied to an individual, > > which means someone would need to expose their creds, which would be a > > bad thing. > > > > --David >