Chris,
Thanks for the fast reply. I have looked into your project. It is not
exactly what we are looking for. Your project resembles http://devstack.org/
but for CS. We are looking basically the opposite - real set of VM-s but at
smaller scale. We have one host full of management VM-s (db, 2xmanagement VM-s,
storage VM, load balancer) and 3 hosts (for XEN guests). It is nearly
production environment, but without L3 switch.
I would say that basic network in CS works well and we have no problems
setting it up. But for advanced networking where traffic should be isolated
and routed it is much more difficult. We often get "No route to host" and
"destination unreachable" because of that.
Vadim.
-----Original Message-----
From: chris snow [mailto:chsnow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:23 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cloudstack advanced networking for development environment
Hi Vadim,
I am trying to setup cloudstack in a single virtualbox virtual machine. My
brief research suggested that it is possible to deploy cloudstack like this for
testing purposes.
I have been roughly following this article:
http://www.greenhills.co.uk/2013/08/30/cloudstack-single-server-on-ubuntu-with-kvm.html
I have been automating the setup using vagrant. I am getting close to
completing, but there is still some distance to go.
My project is here: https://github.com/snowch/stratos-developer-tools.
It may be useful for you, but it will only get you so far in setting up
cloudstack. I still have to figure out how to get the network setup correctly.
Best regards,
Chris
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We would like to setup small cloud to make tests before going to
> production. This cloud supposed to have the same "advanced networking"
> configuration deployed over plain network under 192.168.1.0/24 subnet.
> Roughly this:
> 192.168.1.1 - external GW, DHCP, internet
> 192.168.1.2-99 - guests
> 192.168.1.101-199 - management, load balancer, VIP-s
> 192.168.1.200-210 - storage
>
> Is it possible to make such a setup without using external L3 level switches?
> I.e. is it possible to route internal traffic through some kind of virtual
> switch? What it can be?
>
> Appreciate your thoughts,
>
> Vadim Kimlaychuk
> integratsiooni arhitekt
> tel. 640 2297
> mob. 5233474
>
--
Check out my professional profile and connect with me on LinkedIn.
http://lnkd.in/cw5k69
