Ah, no worries. Thanks for the response Vadim. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee> wrote: > Chris, > > Thanks for the fast reply. I have looked into your project. It is not > exactly what we are looking for. Your project resembles http://devstack.org/ > but for CS. We are looking basically the opposite - real set of VM-s but at > smaller scale. We have one host full of management VM-s (db, 2xmanagement > VM-s, storage VM, load balancer) and 3 hosts (for XEN guests). It is nearly > production environment, but without L3 switch. > I would say that basic network in CS works well and we have no > problems setting it up. But for advanced networking where traffic should be > isolated and routed it is much more difficult. We often get "No route to > host" and "destination unreachable" because of that. > > Vadim. > > -----Original Message----- > From: chris snow [mailto:chsnow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:23 AM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Cloudstack advanced networking for development environment > > Hi Vadim, > > I am trying to setup cloudstack in a single virtualbox virtual machine. My > brief research suggested that it is possible to deploy cloudstack like this > for testing purposes. > > I have been roughly following this article: > > http://www.greenhills.co.uk/2013/08/30/cloudstack-single-server-on-ubuntu-with-kvm.html > > I have been automating the setup using vagrant. I am getting close to > completing, but there is still some distance to go. > > My project is here: https://github.com/snowch/stratos-developer-tools. > > It may be useful for you, but it will only get you so far in setting up > cloudstack. I still have to figure out how to get the network setup > correctly. > > Best regards, > > Chris > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee> > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We would like to setup small cloud to make tests before going to >> production. This cloud supposed to have the same "advanced networking" >> configuration deployed over plain network under 192.168.1.0/24 subnet. >> Roughly this: >> 192.168.1.1 - external GW, DHCP, internet >> 192.168.1.2-99 - guests >> 192.168.1.101-199 - management, load balancer, VIP-s >> 192.168.1.200-210 - storage >> >> Is it possible to make such a setup without using external L3 level >> switches? I.e. is it possible to route internal traffic through some kind of >> virtual switch? What it can be? >> >> Appreciate your thoughts, >> >> Vadim Kimlaychuk >> integratsiooni arhitekt >> tel. 640 2297 >> mob. 5233474 >> > > > > -- > Check out my professional profile and connect with me on LinkedIn. > http://lnkd.in/cw5k69
-- Check out my professional profile and connect with me on LinkedIn. http://lnkd.in/cw5k69
