Hi Ryota, A lot here depends on the 'outside' XenServer's openvswiches ability to pass traffic to a MAC that it can't see. And with the trunking of VLANs The first test I would do is migrate the UserVM to XenServer01-002. If they can communicate then your issue is with the outer networking.
Tim and Remi may know more about bending XenServer networking to your will, but from my general experience: You many well need to configure your outer XenServer (XenServer01) to use promiscuous mode on any interfaces which the nested XenServers use. http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX121729 and you'll need to ensure that tagged VLANs are passed through the guest interfaces on the parent XenServer (XenServer01) as XenServer01-002 will tag traffic with VLAN x,y,z (guest VLAN) which needs to be retained and passed to XenServer01-003 - I don't know how to do that for a XenServer...:( there is also an experimental setting for nested XenServers: https://justus.berlin/2015/07/nested-virtualization-in-citrix-xenserver-6-5-sp1/ Kind regards, Paul Angus [email protected] www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -----Original Message----- From: 丸子良太 / MARUKO，RYOTA [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 15 June 2016 09:57 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: XenServer nested on XenServer Dear Paul&Remi&Tim My networking is as follows. The zone is Advanced mode. I made 3 XenServers as XenServer01-001/002/003 on XenServer01. And I could add the 3 hosts to CloudStack. SSVM and CPVM started in XenServer01-001. So, I could deploy UserVM in XenServer01-002 and VR(DHCP) in XenServer01-003. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ManagementServer(172.168.100.110) | | (PhysicalNetwork) | | XenServer01(172.168.100.100) ------------------------------------ XenServer01-001(172.168.100.101) <--SSVM/CPVM XenServer01-002(172.168.100.102) <--VR(DHCP) XenServer01-003(172.168.100.103) <--UserVM ------------------------------------ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ But, it could not access between the UserVM and the VR. I wander if VLAN is not granted because of the nested XenServer. ~~~~~~~~~~ VR -OK-> XenServer01-002 -OK-> XenServer01 -NG??-> XenServer01-003 --> UserVM ~~~~~~~~~~ Regards >-----Original Message----- >From: 丸子良太 / MARUKO，RYOTA >[mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 5:42 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: XenServer nested on XenServer > >Hi, Paul&Remi&Tim > >Thank you for your e-mail. >And I will write the details of my networking. > >Please wait for my e-mail. >(English is too difficult for me(^^)) > >Regards > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:27 PM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: XenServer nested on XenServer >> >>Hi Paul, >> >>I don’t get it but that’s probably me :-) Never mind. >> >>Regards, >>Remi >> >>On 13/06/16 16:00, "Paul Angus" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>Remi, >>> >>>I think asking for the details for Maruko San's networking in order >>>to give him (hopefully) useful specific help covered >>that part. >>> >>>Haters gonna hate. >>>Paul Angus >>> >>>[email protected] >>>www.shapeblue.com >>>53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:[email protected]] >>>Sent: 13 June 2016 14:26 >>>To: [email protected] >>>Subject: Re: XenServer nested on XenServer >>> >>>I kinda like shameless self-plugs although I fail to see how this one >>>answers the question asked? >>> >>>On 13/06/16 14:09, "Paul Angus" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Maruko San >>>> >>>>We'd need to see the details of your networking. >>>>We've created Trillian github.com/shapeblue/Trillian - it's based on ESXi >>>>and uses CloudStack to orchestrate >everything. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Kind regards, >>>> >>>>Paul Angus >>>> >>>>[email protected] >>>>www.shapeblue.com >>>>53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: 丸子良太 / MARUKO，RYOTA >>>>[mailto:[email protected]] >>>>Sent: 13 June 2016 07:53 >>>>To: [email protected] >>>>Subject: XenServer nested on XenServer >>>> >>>>Hi >>>> >>>>I tried to create XenServer nested on XenServer for CloudStack. >>>>It is success to create XenServer nested on XenServer, And CloudStack >>>>Manager create the system VMs. >>>> >>>>But VR could not access the user VMs. >>>> >>>>Please tell me about the problem. >>>> >>>>Regards >>>> >>>
