Hi Adeel,

With KVM you can still take volume snapshots (of single volumes) – but you 
can’t take full VM snapshots (as you mention these are available only on 
XenServer and VMware) – please note the functionality of these are different 
(see 
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.9/virtual_machines.html#virtual-machine-snapshots
  and 
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.9/storage.html?highlight=volume%20snapshot#working-with-volume-snapshots
 ). With volume snapshots you can still create a template from your completed 
instance root volume, so you should be good here 
(http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.9/templates.html).

With regards to your second hypervisor your choice depends on a few factors. In 
short – XenServer is easy to set up and open source, so low cost, VMware 
requires a few more steps (including vCenter) and comes in at a higher cost due 
to licensing. Functionality wise you can do most things with XenServer – Vmware 
does have a few more bells and whistles though. 

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 22/03/2017, 21:35, "Muhammad Adeel Zahid" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi Dag,
    
    
    I have been able to arrange a switch and create a new subnet of my own 
behind that switch. That way, I am able to install KVM and cloudstack on single 
machine. Haven't tried the second machine. I think, it should work too.
    
    
    Now, I am basically interested in snapshot capability of instances, that 
is, I want to create an instance, install bulk of things on it and then take a 
snapshot  of it. Later on, I would want to use the same snapshot to create new 
instances. Is it possible with KVM? I have read somewhere that this 
functionality is only available with xenserver and vmware? If that is so, can I 
have another host added to same zone that uses a different virtualization 
technology (xenserver or vmware) than my first host (KVM, also the same node 
running ACS management)? Can you recommend any of them please? I am looking at 
this whole thing from R&D paradigm and scalability is not a problem at the 
moment and I want to go with easier-to-setup solution.
    
    
    Regards
    
    Adeel
    
    ________________________________
    From: Muhammad Adeel Zahid <[email protected]>
    Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:19:34 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Cloudstack and KVM installation with IP addresses allocated by 
DHCP
    
    Hi Dag,
    
    
    Thanks for the insight. Let me have a look at alternatives & I will get 
back [??]
    
    ________________________________
    From: Dag Sonstebo <[email protected]>
    Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 6:32:05 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Cloudstack and KVM installation with IP addresses allocated by 
DHCP
    
    Hi Adeel,
    
    This would most likely get you into trouble with your red tape admins – if 
you simply set the IP address 10.103.72.65 statically and let’s say your DHCP 
lease time is 24 hours – then after 24 hours the DHCP server will not have seen 
any DHCP renewals (DHCP starts the renewal process after half the lease time – 
i.e. in this case 12 hours), and therefore assumes the address is no longer in 
use. Another host may therefore pick up the same IP and you end up with IP 
conflicts.
    
    Regards,
    Dag Sonstebo
    Cloud Architect
    ShapeBlue
    
    On 22/03/2017, 12:39, "Muhammad Adeel Zahid" <[email protected]> wrote:
    
        Hi Dag,
    
    
        DHCP and its settings are beyond my control. I will have to go through 
some procedures (aka red tape) to get the exclusions static IPs bound to ACS 
and KVM. For now,  what I am thinking to do is, connect to network and get an 
IP 10.103.72.65 and declare it as static in network settings of my computer 
(say ACS management server) and rely on the fact that IP wouldn't change as 
long as I don't reconnect.
    
        Once the testing is done, we can go through the approval procedures for 
MAC binding and IP addresses exclusion from DHCP.
    
    
        Would it work as I think?
    
    
        Regards
    
        Adeel
    
        ________________________________
        From: Dag Sonstebo <[email protected]>
        Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 5:31:12 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: Cloudstack and KVM installation with IP addresses 
allocated by DHCP
    
        Hi Muhammed,
    
        This is done externally to CloudStack and depends on what DHCP 
infrastructure you have in place. All DHCP implementations have the option to 
reserve an address, i.e. a setting that confirms your MAC address – e.g. 
01:02:03:AA:BB:CC is always handed out the same IP address – in your case e.g. 
10.103.72.65/23. Once you have set this on your DHCP server(s) you can safely 
set the IP address statically on your servers if you don’t want to rely on DHCP 
– this means you will never have an IP conflict between a statically configured 
IP address and your DHCP scope.
    
        Please note though – you will most likely need more IP addresses for 
CloudStack than the 1 (2?) you already have – CloudStack needs more IP 
addresses for it’s system range. As a result you are much better off using a 
subnet without DHCP – or configure an exclusion in your DHCP scope, e.g. 
something 10.103.72.1-10.103.72.99, such that you can safely use this excluded 
range for CloudStack.
    
        Regards,
        Dag Sonstebo
        Cloud Architect
        ShapeBlue
    
        On 22/03/2017, 12:22, "Muhammad Adeel Zahid" <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    
            Thanks Boris and Dag for quick reply.
    
    
            @Dag How do I utilize static IP addresses in combination with DHCP 
reservations?
    
    
            I have just installed CentOs and connected to the network on wire. 
DHCP has given me 10.103.72.65/23 IP address. What do I need to do from now on?
    
    
            Regards
    
            ________________________________
            From: Dag Sonstebo <[email protected]>
            Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 4:41:26 PM
            To: [email protected]
            Subject: Re: Cloudstack and KVM installation with IP addresses 
allocated by DHCP
    
            Hi Muhammed,
    
            This may be possible if your DNS infrastructure is rock solid and 
is guaranteed to work from all CloudStack networks (you would possibly also 
have to set your TTL on your DNS entries low)  – but all in all I would 
recommend you utilize static IP addresses, alternatively in combination with 
DHCP reservations to ensure you don’t have IP conflicts in your infrastructure.
    
            Regards,
            Dag Sonstebo
            Cloud Architect
            ShapeBlue
    
            On 22/03/2017, 11:26, "Muhammad Adeel Zahid" <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    
                Hello guys,
    
    
                I have two systems and both of them are connected to a network 
that allocates IP addresses using DHCP. I want to install cloudstack management 
server on the one system and KVM (hypervisor) on the other system.
    
                Can I do this? What steps would differ from normal (with static 
IPs)  ACS and KVM installation?
    
    
                Regards
    
                Adeel
    
    
    
            [email protected]
            www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
            53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
            @shapeblue
    
    
    
    
    
    
        [email protected]
        www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
        53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
        @shapeblue
    
    
    
    
    
    
    [email protected]
    www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
    53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
    @shapeblue
    
    
    
    


[email protected] 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Reply via email to