Since NFS alone doesn't offer HA. What do you recommend for HA NFS?

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 7:37 AM Hean Seng <heans...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have similar consideration when start exploring  Cloudstack , but in
> reality  Clustered Filesystem is not easy to maintain.  You seems have
> choice of OCFS or GFS2 ,  gfs2 is hard to maintain and in redhat ,  ocfs
> recently only maintained in oracle linux.  I believe you do not want to
> choose solution that is very propriety .   Thus just SAN or ISCSI o is not
> really a direct solution here , except you want to encapsulate it in NFS
> and facing Cloudstack Storage.
>
> It work good on CEPH and NFS , but performance wise,  NFS is better . And
> all documentation and features you saw  in Cloudstack , it work perfectly
> on NFS.
>
> If you choose CEPH,  may be you have to compensate with some performance
> degradation,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:44 AM Leandro Mendes <theflock...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I've been using Ceph in prod for volumes for some time. Note that
> although
> > I had several cloudstack installations,  this one runs on top of Cinder,
> > but it basic translates as libvirt and rados.
> >
> > It is totally stable and performance IMHO is enough for virtualized
> > services.
> >
> > IO might suffer some penalization due the data replication inside Ceph.
> > Elasticsearch for instance, the degradation would be a bit worse as there
> > is replication also in the application size, but IMHO, unless you need
> > extreme low latency it would be ok.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Leandro.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021, 11:20 AM Brussk, Michael <
> michael.bru...@nttdata.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello community,
> > >
> > > today I need your experience and knowhow about clustered/shared
> > > filesystems based on SAN storage to be used with KVM.
> > > We need to consider about a clustered/shared filesystem based on SAN
> > > storage (no NFS or iSCSI), but do not have any knowhow or experience
> with
> > > this.
> > > Those I would like to ask if there any productive used environments out
> > > there based on SAN storage on KVM?
> > > If so, which clustered/shared filesystem you are using and how is your
> > > experience with that (stability, reliability, maintainability,
> > performance,
> > > useability,...)?
> > > Furthermore, if you had already to consider in the past between SAN
> > > storage or CEPH, I would also like to participate on your
> considerations
> > > and results :)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Michael
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hean Seng
>


-- 
*Regards,*
*Pratik Chandrakar*

Reply via email to